In this issue of JAMA Surgery, McCarty et al1 report results from a well-done crossover randomized clinical trial of tourniquet application using a high-fidelity mannequin to simulate lower-extremity hemorrhage, specifically evaluating the effectiveness of the Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) course and the ability of individuals to use 4 commercial tourniquets (ie, 2 windlass-based tourniquets, the Combat Application Tourniquet [CAT], and the Special Operations Forces Tactical Tourniquet [SOFT-T]), and 2 elastic tourniquets (Stretch-Wrap-and-Tuck Tourniquet and Rapid Application Tourniquet System), and an improvised tourniquet (ie, from gauze, a shoestring, a leather belt, and a piece of wood).1 A total of 102 participants were recruited immediately following completion of a B-Con course, where CAT was the only tourniquet specifically taught, and randomized to different sequences of tourniquet application, with correct placement (defined as a composite of adequate pressure, positioning, and timing) as the primary outcome and pressure, time, estimated blood loss, and understanding of the device as secondary outcomes. The CAT was correctly applied by 92% of participants, followed by the SOFT-T (69% of participants), the improvised tourniquet (32% of participants), and both elastic tourniquets (12% of participants each). Additionally, the CAT resulted in the highest obtained pressure, shortest time to placement, and least amount of blood loss. Participants demonstrated best understanding of both windlass-based tourniquets, followed by the improvised tourniquet.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Haukoos J, Sasson C. Prehospital Hemorrhage Control—Leveraging Successes From Cardiac Arrest to Optimize Population-Level Effectiveness. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):930–931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2276
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: