To the Editor We read with great interest the results of the cohort study by Haugen et al1 about liver transplant trends from 2003 to 2016 and the outcomes of older donors. We congratulate the authors for the extensive review and important results.
We found relevant that data show an increase in older donor rejection over time and a decrease in its use. The early decrease in using older donors seems justified after the initial poor results associated with those grafts compared with those of younger donors, as seen in the 2003 through 2009 group. However, the improvement of the overall results as time passes and the higher experience with the use of older donors show enough evidence to justify the use of older donors.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Beltran Miranda P, Gomez Bravo MA, Padillo Ruiz FJ. Safety and Benefit of Using Liver Grafts From Older Donors. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):978–979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2186
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: