[Skip to Navigation]
Comment & Response
August 21, 2019

Addressing Limitations in Case-Control Study of Patients Undergoing Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta

Author Affiliations
  • 1Section of Surgical Sciences, Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery, & Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 2Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center Service, Nashville Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 3Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1165-1166. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2738

To the Editor As members of the trauma community who use resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), we read with great interest the article by Joseph et al.1 The authors have executed a statistically complex and important registry-based study. However, we are concerned with identifying this research design as a case-control study.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words