Access to surgical care differs from access to nonsurgical care. Frameworks that account for the efficiency of an initial diagnosis, an appropriate workup, and a subsequent intervention may more accurately reflect meaningful access from the patient’s perspective than does the interval between specialty referral and specialty clinic visit. In an effort to optimize the use of physician specialists in the setting of limited resources1 and to maximize efficiency, the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LAC DHS) has pursued clinical integration by concurrently instituting empanelment, an electronic specialty referral system (eConsult; Safety Net Connect), and jointly defined clinical algorithms (expected practices) for managing common diagnoses. We assessed the association of these 3 aspects of clinical integration with access to urologic care.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Pannell SC, Soni SM, Giboney P, Santamaria A, Bergman J. Access to Urologic Care Through Clinical Integration in a Large, Underserved Population. JAMA Surg. Published online August 28, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2525
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: