[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 516
Citations 0
JAMA Network Insights
September 18, 2019

Robotic Platform Use in General Thoracic Surgery

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. Published online September 18, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3361

Traditional general thoracic surgery for treating lung, mediastinal, and esophageal malignancy and diseases often required large access incisions, such as a thoracotomy, sternotomy, and laparotomy. With the introduction of minimally invasive techniques in the 1990s and early 2000s, there began to be improvements in length of stay, morbidity, and mortality in patients. By adopting these techniques for smaller procedures, such as wedge resection and pleural biopsy, the penetrance of minimally invasive techniques for anatomic resections, such as lobectomy, has been much more restrained.1 A review of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database indicates that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomies have plateaued at about 50% of lobectomies performed.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words