[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.134.98. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 94
Citations 0
Comment & Response
September 18, 2019

Global Action Needed to Protect Humanitarian Surgeons and Patients During Wars and Armed Conflicts—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery and Center for Global Health and Innovation, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • 2Palo Alto Veterans Hospital, Palo Alto, California
  • 3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
  • 4Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. Published online September 18, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3501

In Reply We agree with Jindal’s amplification of the fact that humanitarian workers and medical staff continue to be subjected to illegal targeted attacks in violation of International Humanitarian Law and that surgeons should join efforts to hold countries accountable for violations. We disagree with the statement by Jindal that the focus of our recommendations for predeployment training on Geneva Conventions and International Humanitarian Law was to “reduce or eliminate” risks to health care workers. Our Viewpoint focused on specific areas where surgeons, in their role as humanitarian workers, would require specific content knowledge from the Geneva Conventions and International Humanitarian Law to work within the conflict environment.1 We explained that detailed knowledge of these laws and conventions is necessary in surgical care and triage to ensure that injured combatants receive care irrespective of their affiliations; further acts of reprisal or violence to injured combatants do not occur; and observed violations are reported. It is also clear that health care workers without this type of training may find themselves in situations where they inadvertently violate the humanitarian principles of independence, neutrality, and impartiality. A report that critically evaluated the humanitarian trauma response of the 2016/2017 battle of Mosul in Iraq raised serious concerns about violations of humanitarian principles by health care workers and cited specific examples such as “ colocation or embedding of medical personnel with Iraqi security forces”2 and “questions regarding neutrality … medical responders talked publicly of defeating ISIS and were not able to work with all warring factions.”2 These real-world examples demonstrate why predeployment training is critical for surgeons interested in humanitarian work. The requisite knowledge base for humanitarian responses to crises in conflict zones differs significantly from humanitarian responses to natural disasters. Disaster response typically does not have a complex contextual environment including combatants. Without specific training for work in conflict zones, surgeons may not have all of the necessary knowledge to conduct themselves and their provision of care in accordance with humanitarian principles.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×