Since the establishment of the 1972 Social Security Amendment to cover permanent kidney failure, the population needing dialysis in the United States has grown from an initial estimate of 10 000 beneficiaries to more than 500 000 prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis.1 Dialysis clinics in the United States, a landscape now dominated by commercial entities, provide life-sustaining therapy that delays mortality by a mean of 5 years. The undeniable medical success coupled with the financial profitability of clinics may have overshadowed the intended purpose of dialysis: a rehabilitative therapy designed as a bridge to kidney transplant. As the preferred form of renal replacement therapy, transplants are both cost-effective2 and have the greatest survival advantage, extending life by 7 to 11 years, depending on the cause of kidney failure.3
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Kshirsagar AV, Kibbe MR, Gerber DA. Transplant First, Dialysis Last. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(11):991–992. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4286
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.