The use of robotic surgery for common operations, such as colectomy, but also for even simple procedures, such as inguinal and ventral hernia surgery, is increasing rapidly. In 2012, a trial1 randomized patients with right‐sided colonic cancer to receive robot-assisted colectomy or laparoscopically assisted colectomy. Of 70 randomized patients, hospital stay, surgical complications, resection-margin clearance, and the number of lymph nodes harvested were similar in both groups. The duration of surgery was longer in the robotic group, and overall hospital costs were also significantly higher.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Bom WJ, Boermeester MA. Robotics Against the Evidence. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):49–50. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4084
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: