Guidelines and standards endorsed by national associations and government agencies have become increasingly familiar in the health care industry.1 Designed to promote best practices, guidelines and standards are thought to ensure safety, quality, and decrease costs. However, like many practices in medicine, they are not always evidence based. As a result, health care organizations will adopt guidelines driven by weak or limited evidence and implement them as mandatory policies.1,2 Unfortunately, the adoption of these practices frequently leads to several unintended consequences: health care professionals may be frustrated and burdened by unnecessary tasks that take time away from treating patients, and new products may increase costs without improving outcomes or resources necessary to manage and monitor adherence. Finally, these products may contribute to medical waste—already the second largest contributor to trash in the United States.3
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Maggio PM, Hawn MT. Mandatory Use of Perioperative Disposable Jackets—Things We Do for No Good Reason. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):21. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4086
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: