The coordinated chaos of the trauma team’s response to the patient who has experienced violence is urgent and measured, influenced by the science of injury and the principles of public health. Still nothing resonates as deeply as the voice of the survivor, the cornerstone in understanding the long-term consequences of violence.
Penetrating more deeply than radiography, the patient narrative opens a window into forces of health inequity hidden within the otherwise invisible structural and social determinants of health.1 In healing violence through hospital-based intervention work, an intervention specialist depends on the victim’s words, reporting needs to address root causes of violence.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Dicker RA, Punch LJ. Long-term Consequences in Trauma: At the Center of the Public Health Approach Is the Survivor’s Voice. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):59–60. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4560
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: