To the Editor We read with interest the Childers et al article1 advocating National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry use for calculating surgical work relative value units (WRVU). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) advocates using objective verified data (eg, STS National Database) rather than survey estimates to most accurately value surgeon work.2,3 This is the second article in the last 5 months4 using NSQIP for physician reimbursement. Both authors used different methods, arriving at diametrically opposed payment conclusions. Childers et al1 concluded cardiac and neurosurgery have overvalued procedures, while orthopedics and urology undervalued procedures. In contrast, Chan et al4 found cardiothoracic and neurosurgeons were underpaid ($130 and $60 million, respectively) while orthopedic surgeons and urologists were overpaid ($160 and $40 million, respectively).4
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Nichols FC, Lahey SJ, Levett JM. Varying Estimations of Surgical Work Value Units. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):177. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4635
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: