Long-term Functional, Psychological, Emotional, and Social Outcomes in Survivors of Firearm Injuries | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.206.238.77. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Resnick  S, Smith  RN, Beard  JH,  et al.  Firearm deaths in America: can we learn from 462,000 lives lost?  Ann Surg. 2017;266(3):432-440. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002376PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Grinshteyn  E, Hemenway  D.  Violent death rates: the US compared with other high-income OECD countries, 2010.  Am J Med. 2016;129(3):266-273. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.025PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Davis  AB, Gaudino  JA, Soskolne  CL, Al-Delaimy  WK; International Network for Epidemiology in Policy (Formerly known as IJPC-SE).  The role of epidemiology in firearm violence prevention: a policy brief.  Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(4):1015-1019. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER: about underlying cause of death, 1999-2017. https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/saved/D76/D48F344. Published December 2018. Accessed December 01, 2018.
5.
Coupet  E  Jr, Karp  D, Wiebe  DJ, Kit Delgado  M.  Shift in US payer responsibility for the acute care of violent injuries after the Affordable Care Act: implications for prevention.  Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(12):2192-2196. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.070PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Spitzer  SA, Staudenmayer  KL, Tennakoon  L, Spain  DA, Weiser  TG.  Costs and financial burden of initial hospitalizations for firearm injuries in the United States, 2006-2014.  Am J Public Health. 2017;107(5):770-774. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303684PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.  A National Trauma Care System: Integrating Military and Civilian Trauma Systems to Achieve Zero Preventable Deaths After Injury. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016.
8.
Bulger  EM, Kuhls  DA, Campbell  BT,  et al.  Proceedings from the medical summit on firearm injury prevention: a public health approach to reduce death and disability in the US.  J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229(4):415-430.e12. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Gabbe  BJ, Sutherland  AM, Hart  MJ, Cameron  PA.  Population-based capture of long-term functional and quality of life outcomes after major trauma: the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry.  J Trauma. 2010;69(3):532-536. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5125bPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Gabbe  BJ, Simpson  PM, Sutherland  AM,  et al.  Functional measures at discharge: are they useful predictors of longer term outcomes for trauma registries?  Ann Surg. 2008;247(5):854-859. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656d1ePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Gabbe  BJ, Simpson  PM, Cameron  PA,  et al.  Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: a population-based longitudinal study.  PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002322. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002322PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Haider  AH, Herrera-Escobar  JP, Al Rafai  SS,  et al.  Factors associated with long-term outcomes after injury: results of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery After Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) multicenter cohort study  [published online Decembe 13, 2018].  Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003101PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Fowler  KA, Dahlberg  LL, Haileyesus  T, Annest  JL.  Firearm injuries in the United States.  Prev Med. 2015;79:5-14. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Smith  RN, Seamon  MJ, Kumar  V,  et al.  Lasting impression of violence: retained bullets and depressive symptoms.  Injury. 2018;49(1):135-140. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Maa  J, Darzi  A.  Firearm injuries and violence prevention—the potential power of a surgeon general’s report.  N Engl J Med. 2018;379(5):408-410. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1803295PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Masiakos  PT, Warshaw  AL.  Stopping the bleeding is not enough.  Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):37-38. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001969PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Alcorn  T.  Trends in research publications about gun violence in the United States, 1960 to 2014.  JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):124-126. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7076PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Keller  D, Kulp  H, Maher  Z, Santora  TA, Goldberg  AJ, Seamon  MJ.  Life after near death: long-term outcomes of emergency department thoracotomy survivors.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1315-1320. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c3db4PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Kisala  PA, Boulton  AJ, Cohen  ML,  et al.  Interviewer- versus self-administration of PROMIS® measures for adults with traumatic injury.  Health Psychol. 2019;38(5):435-444. doi:10.1037/hea0000685PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Hung  M, Stuart  AR, Higgins  TF, Saltzman  CL, Kubiak  EN.  Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS Physical Function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients.  J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(8):439-443. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Brodke  DJ, Saltzman  CL, Brodke  DS.  PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(11):744-749. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
HealthMeasures. Intro to PROMIS. http://healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis. Updated 2019. Accessed June 1, 2018.
23.
Gabbe  BJ, Williamson  OD, Cameron  PA, Dowrick  AS.  Choosing outcome assessment instruments for trauma registries.  Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(8):751-758. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2005.03.527PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Black  N.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.  BMJ. 2013;346:f167. doi:10.1136/bmj.f167PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Pape  HC, Zelle  B, Lohse  R,  et al.  Evaluation and outcome of patients after polytrauma—can patients be recruited for long-term follow-up [published correction appears in Injury. 2008;39(1):137]?  Injury. 2006;37(12):1197-1203. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.032PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Weinberger  M, Oddone  EZ, Samsa  GP, Landsman  PB.  Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration?  J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(2):135-140. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00556-0PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Wilde  EA, Whiteneck  GG, Bogner  J,  et al.  Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1650-1660.e17. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Gershon  RC, Rothrock  N, Hanrahan  R, Bass  M, Cella  D.  The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research.  J Appl Meas. 2010;11(3):304-314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Cella  D, Riley  W, Stone  A,  et al; PROMIS Cooperative Group.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179-1194. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Fries  JF, Bruce  B, Cella  D.  The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes.  Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5)(suppl 39):S53-S57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Gabbe  BJ, Sutherland  AM, Williamson  OD, Cameron  PA.  Use of health care services 6 months following major trauma.  Aust Health Rev. 2007;31(4):628-632. doi:10.1071/AH070628PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Livingston  DH, Tripp  T, Biggs  C, Lavery  RF.  A fate worse than death? long-term outcome of trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit.  J Trauma. 2009;67(2):341-348. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5cc34PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Soberg  HL, Bautz-Holter  E, Roise  O, Finset  A.  Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.  J Trauma. 2007;62(2):461-470. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000222916.30253.eaPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Holtslag  HR, van Beeck  EF, Lindeman  E, Leenen  LP.  Determinants of long-term functional consequences after major trauma.  J Trauma. 2007;62(4):919-927. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000224124.47646.62PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Butcher  JL, MacKenzie  EJ, Cushing  B,  et al.  Long-term outcomes after lower extremity trauma.  J Trauma. 1996;41(1):4-9. doi:10.1097/00005373-199607000-00002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Vitesnikova  J, Dinh  M, Leonard  E, Boufous  S, Conigrave  K.  Use of AUDIT-C as a tool to identify hazardous alcohol consumption in admitted trauma patients.  Injury. 2014;45(9):1440-1444. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Livingston  M, Callinan  S.  Underreporting in alcohol surveys: whose drinking is underestimated?  J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015;76(1):158-164. doi:10.15288/jsad.2015.76.158PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Prins  A, Ouimette  P, Kimerling  R,  et al.  The Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD): developments and operating characteristics.  Prim Care Psychiatry. 2003;9(1):9-14. doi:10.1185/135525703125002360Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Prins  A, Bovin  MJ, Smolenski  DJ,  et al.  The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): development and evaluation within a veteran primary care sample.  J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(10):1206-1211. doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3703-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Steel  JL, Dunlavy  AC, Stillman  J, Pape  HC.  Measuring depression and PTSD after trauma: common scales and checklists.  Injury. 2011;42(3):288-300. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.045PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
National Institutes of Health. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd.shtml. Updated November 2017. Accessed December 1, 2018.
42.
Zatzick  D, Jurkovich  GJ, Rivara  FP,  et al.  A national US study of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and work and functional outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic injury.  Ann Surg. 2008;248(3):429-437. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185a6b8PubMedGoogle Scholar
43.
Holbrook  TL, Hoyt  DB, Coimbra  R, Potenza  B, Sise  M, Anderson  JP.  Long-term posttraumatic stress disorder persists after major trauma in adolescents: new data on risk factors and functional outcome.  J Trauma. 2005;58(4):764-769. doi:10.1097/01.TA.0000159247.48547.7DPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Holbrook  TL, Hoyt  DB, Stein  MB, Sieber  WJ.  Gender differences in long-term posttraumatic stress disorder outcomes after major trauma: women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes than men.  J Trauma. 2002;53(5):882-888. doi:10.1097/00005373-200211000-00012PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Trost  Z, Agtarap  S, Scott  W,  et al.  Perceived injustice after traumatic injury: associations with pain, psychological distress, and quality of life outcomes 12 months after injury.  Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60(3):213-221. doi:10.1037/rep0000043PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Holbrook  TL, Hoyt  DB, Stein  MB, Sieber  WJ.  Perceived threat to life predicts posttraumatic stress disorder after major trauma: risk factors and functional outcome.  J Trauma. 2001;51(2):287-292. doi:10.1097/00005373-200108000-00010PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    November 20, 2019

    Long-term Functional, Psychological, Emotional, and Social Outcomes in Survivors of Firearm Injuries

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
    • 2currently affiliated with Division of Acute Care Surgery and Trauma, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
    • 3Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
    • 4currently affiliated with Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
    • 5medical student, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
    • 6Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
    JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):51-59. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4533
    Key Points

    Question  What are the long-term physical, mental, emotional, and social outcomes among individuals with gunshot wounds?

    Findings  In this cohort study of patient-reported outcome measures, 183 young adult patients (median age, 27 years) who survived gunshot wounds (median time from injury, 5.9 years) reported worse physical and mental health compared with the general population, 48.6% had positive screen findings for probable posttraumatic stress disorder, and unemployment and substance use increased by 14.3% and 13.2%, respectively, after injury.

    Meaning  These findings suggest that the outcomes of firearm injury reach far beyond mortality statistics; survivors of gunshot wounds may benefit from early identification and the initiation of long-term, multidisciplinary longitudinal care to improve recovery.

    Abstract

    Importance  The outcomes of firearm injuries in the United States are devastating. Although firearm mortality and costs have been investigated, the long-term outcomes after surviving a gunshot wound (GSW) remain unstudied.

    Objective  To determine the long-term functional, psychological, emotional, and social outcomes among survivors of firearm injuries.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective cohort study assessed patient-reported outcomes among GSW survivors from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017, at a single urban level I trauma center. Attempts were made to contact all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) discharged alive during the study period. A total of 3088 patients were identified; 516 (16.7%) who died during hospitalization and 45 (1.5%) who died after discharge were excluded. Telephone contact was made with 263 (10.4%) of the remaining patients, and 80 (30.4%) declined study participation. The final study sample consisted of 183 participants. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2018, through June 20, 2019.

    Exposures  A GSW sustained from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Scores on 8 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Physical Function, Emotional Support, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Pain Intensity, Alcohol Use, and Severity of Substance Use) and the Primary Care PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.

    Results  Of the 263 patients who survived a GSW and were contacted, 183 (69.6%) participated. Participants were more likely to be admitted to the hospital compared with those who declined (150 [82.0%] vs 54 [67.5%]; P = .01). Participants had a median time from GSW of 5.9 years (range, 4.7-8.1 years) and were primarily young (median age, 27 years [range, 21-36 years]), black (168 [91.8%]), male (169 [92.3%]), and employed before GSW (pre-GSW, 139 [76.0%]; post-GSW, 113 [62.1%]; decrease, 14.3%; P = .004). Combined alcohol and substance use increased by 13.2% (pre-GSW use, 56 [30.8%]; post-GSW use, 80 [44.0%]). Participants had mean (SD) scores below population norms (50 [10]) for Global Physical Health (45 [11]; P < .001), Global Mental Health (48 [11]; P = .03), and Physical Function (45 [12]; P < .001) PROMIS metrics. Eighty-nine participants (48.6%) had a positive screen for probable PTSD. Patients who required intensive care unit admission (n = 64) had worse mean (SD) Physical Function scores (42 [13] vs 46 [11]; P = .045) than those not requiring the intensive care unit. Survivors no more than 5 years after injury had greater PTSD risk (38 of 63 [60.3%] vs 51 of 119 [42.9%]; P = .03) but better mean (SD) Global Physical Health scores (47 [11] vs 43 [11]; P = .04) than those more than 5 years after injury.

    Conclusions and Relevance  This study’s results suggest that the lasting effects of firearm injury reach far beyond mortality and economic burden. Survivors of GSWs may have negative outcomes for years after injury. These findings suggest that early identification and initiation of long-term longitudinal care is paramount.

    ×