Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Colorectal Cancer | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Canadian Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer statistics. https://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/colorectal/statistics/?region=on. 2015. Accessed March 4, 2015.
2.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, National Cancer Institute. Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. 2015. Accessed March 4, 2015.
3.
National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. Cancer and equality groups: key metrics. http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_type_and_topic_specific_work/topic_specific_work/equality. 2015. Accessed March 4, 2015.
4.
Al-Refaie  WB, Parsons  HM, Henderson  WG,  et al.  Major cancer surgery in the elderly: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.  Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):311-318. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6b04cPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Morley  JE, Vellas  B, van Kan  GA,  et al.  Frailty consensus: a call to action.  J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392-397. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Partridge  JS, Harari  D, Dhesi  JK.  Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review.  Age Ageing. 2012;41(2):142-147. doi:10.1093/ageing/afr182PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Hewitt  J, Long  S, Carter  B, Bach  S, McCarthy  K, Clegg  A.  The prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes in general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Age Ageing. 2018;47(6):793-800. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy110PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Fagard  K, Leonard  S, Deschodt  M,  et al.  The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.  J Geriatr Oncol. 2016;7(6):479-491. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2016.06.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Milder  DA, Pillinger  NL, Kam  PCA.  The role of prehabilitation in frail surgical patients: a systematic review.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(10):1356-1366. doi:10.1111/aas.13239PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Looijaard  SMLM, Slee-Valentijn  MS, Otten  RHJ, Maier  AB.  Physical and nutritional prehabilitation in older patients with colorectal carcinoma: a systematic review.  J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018;41(4):236-244. doi:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000125PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
McIsaac  DI, Jen  T, Mookerji  N, Patel  A, Lalu  MM.  Interventions to improve the outcomes of frail people having surgery: a systematic review.  PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0190071. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190071PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Okabe  H, Ohsaki  T, Ogawa  K,  et al.  Frailty predicts severe postoperative complications after elective colorectal surgery.  Am J Surg. 2019;217(4):677-681. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Carli  F, Zavorsky  GS.  Optimizing functional exercise capacity in the elderly surgical population.  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8(1):23-32. doi:10.1097/00075197-200501000-00005PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Carli  F, Scheede-Bergdahl  C.  Prehabilitation to enhance perioperative care.  Anesthesiol Clin. 2015;33(1):17-33. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Gillis  C, Li  C, Lee  L,  et al.  Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.  Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):937-947. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000393PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Bousquet-Dion  G, Awasthi  R, Loiselle  SE,  et al.  Evaluation of supervised multimodal prehabilitation programme in cancer patients undergoing colorectal resection: a randomized control trial.  Acta Oncol. 2018;57(6):849-859. doi:10.1080/0284186X.2017.1423180PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Minnella  EM, Awasthi  R, Gillis  C,  et al.  Patients with poor baseline walking capacity are most likely to improve their functional status with multimodal prehabilitation.  Surgery. 2016;160(4):1070-1079. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.036PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Carli  F, Silver  JK, Feldman  LS,  et al.  Surgical prehabilitation in patients with cancer: state-of-the-science and recommendations for future research from a panel of subject matter experts.  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(1):49-64. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2016.09.002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Moher  D, Hopewell  S, Schulz  KF,  et al.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.  BMJ. 2010;340:c869. doi:10.1136/bmj.c869PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Fried  LP, Tangen  CM, Walston  J,  et al; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-M156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Makary  MA, Segev  DL, Pronovost  PJ,  et al.  Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients.  J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901-908. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Gustafsson  UO, Scott  MJ, Hubner  M,  et al.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018.  World J Surg. 2019;43(3):659-695. doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4844-yPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Carli  F, Charlebois  P, Baldini  G, Cachero  O, Stein  B.  An integrated multidisciplinary approach to implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.  Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(11):837-842. doi:10.1007/s12630-009-9159-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Carli  F, Charlebois  P, Stein  B,  et al.  Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg. 2010;97(8):1187-1197. doi:10.1002/bjs.7102PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Simunovic  M, Rempel  E, Thériault  ME,  et al.  Influence of delays to nonemergent colon cancer surgery on operative mortality, disease-specific survival and overall survival.  Can J Surg. 2009;52(4):E79-E86. http://canjsurg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/52-4-E79.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Awasthi  R, Minnella  EM, Ferreira  V, Ramanakumar  AV, Scheede-Bergdahl  C, Carli  F.  Supervised exercise training with multimodal pre-habilitation leads to earlier functional recovery following colorectal cancer resection.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(4):461-467. doi:10.1111/aas.13292PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Thompson  WRGN, Pescatello  LS.  ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
28.
Bauer  J, Capra  S, Ferguson  M.  Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(8):779-785. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Bush  MA, Martineau  C, Pronk  JA, Brulé  D.  Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide: “A tool for the times”.  Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007;68(2):92-96. doi:10.3148/68.2.2007.92PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Weimann  A, Braga  M, Carli  F,  et al.  ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery.  Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623-650. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Arends  J, Bachmann  P, Baracos  V,  et al.  ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients.  Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):11-48. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Campbell  WW, Leidy  HJ.  Dietary protein and resistance training effects on muscle and body composition in older persons.  J Am Coll Nutr. 2007;26(6):696S-703S. doi:10.1080/07315724.2007.10719650PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Gorissen  SH, Horstman  AM, Franssen  R,  et al.  Ingestion of wheat protein increases in vivo muscle protein synthesis rates in healthy older men in a randomized trial.  J Nutr. 2016;146(9):1651-1659. doi:10.3945/jn.116.231340PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Slankamenac  K, Graf  R, Barkun  J, Puhan  MA, Clavien  PA.  The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity.  Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):1-7. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Slankamenac  K, Nederlof  N, Pessaux  P,  et al.  The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials.  Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):757-762. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Dindo  D, Demartines  N, Clavien  PA.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.  Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.aePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Moriello  C, Mayo  NE, Feldman  L, Carli  F.  Validating the six-minute walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1083-1089. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.031PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Pecorelli  N, Fiore  JF  Jr, Gillis  C,  et al.  The six-minute walk test as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal resection: further examination of its measurement properties.  Surg Endosc. 2016;30(6):2199-2206. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4478-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Antonescu  I, Scott  S, Tran  TT, Mayo  NE, Feldman  LS.  Measuring postoperative recovery: what are clinically meaningful differences?  Surgery. 2014;156(2):319-327. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.005PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Hopman  WM, Towheed  T, Anastassiades  T,  et al; Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.  Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey.  CMAJ. 2000;163(3):265-271. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/163/3/265. Accessed December 13, 2019.Google Scholar
41.
Zigmond  AS, Snaith  RP.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361-370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Feldman  LS, Kaneva  P, Demyttenaere  S, Carli  F, Fried  GM, Mayo  NE.  Validation of a physical activity questionnaire (CHAMPS) as an indicator of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surgery. 2009;146(1):31-39. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.019PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Lee  L, Mata  J, Ghitulescu  GA,  et al.  Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery.  Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1026-1033. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001019PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Rubin  DB.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 2004.
45.
Mayo  NE, Feldman  L, Scott  S,  et al.  Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery.  Surgery. 2011;150(3):505-514. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Hendry  PO, Hausel  J, Nygren  J,  et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group.  Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme.  Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):197-205. doi:10.1002/bjs.6445PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Almasaudi  AS, McSorley  ST, Horgan  PG, McMillan  DC, Edwards  CA.  The relationship between body mass index, sex, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer.  Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;30:185-189. doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.12.084PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Butt  P, Beirness  D, Gliksman  L, Paradis  C, Stockwell  T.  Alcohol and Health in Canada: A Summary of Evidence and Guidelines for Low-Risk Drinking. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2011.
49.
Mazzola  M, Bertoglio  C, Boniardi  M,  et al.  Frailty in major oncologic surgery of upper gastrointestinal tract: how to improve postoperative outcomes.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(8):1566-1571. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Chia  CL, Mantoo  SK, Tan  KY.  ‘Start to finish trans-institutional transdisciplinary care’: a novel approach improves colorectal surgical results in frail elderly patients.  Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(1):O43-O50. doi:10.1111/codi.13166PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Lee  L, Liberman  S, Charlebois  P,  et al.  The impact of complications after elective colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery pathway.  Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(3):191-199. doi:10.1007/s10151-018-1761-xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Karelis  AD, Messier  V, Suppère  C, Briand  P, Rabasa-Lhoret  R.  Effect of cysteine-rich whey protein (Immunocal®) supplementation in combination with resistance training on muscle strength and lean body mass in non-frail elderly subjects: a randomized, double-blind controlled study.  J Nutr Health Aging. 2015;19(5):531-536. doi:10.1007/s12603-015-0442-yPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    Original Investigation
    January 22, 2020

    Effect of Multimodal Prehabilitation vs Postoperative Rehabilitation on 30-Day Postoperative Complications for Frail Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • 2Currently a medical student at Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • 3Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • 4Department of Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • 5Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • 6Department of Anesthesia, McGill Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    JAMA Surg. 2020;155(3):233-242. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5474
    Key Points

    Question  To what extent does a prehabilitation program affect 30-day postoperative complications in frail patients scheduled for colorectal cancer resection?

    Findings  In this randomized clinical trial including 110 frail patients undergoing colorectal surgery (87 [79.1%] minimally invasive) within an enhanced recovery pathway, prehabilitation did not affect postoperative complications (measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index) compared with postoperative rehabilitation. Other postoperative outcomes were also similar between groups.

    Meaning  This study suggests that prehabilitation does not improve postoperative outcomes compared with postoperative rehabilitation in frail patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection.

    Abstract

    Importance  Research supports use of prehabilitation to optimize physical status before and after colorectal cancer resection, but its effect on postoperative complications remains unclear. Frail patients are a target for prehabilitation interventions owing to increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes.

    Objective  To assess the extent to which a prehabilitation program affects 30-day postoperative complications in frail patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection compared with postoperative rehabilitation.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This single-blind, parallel-arm, superiority randomized clinical trial recruited patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection from September 7, 2015, through June 19, 2019. Patients were followed up for 4 weeks before surgery and 4 weeks after surgery at 2 university-affiliated tertiary hospitals. A total of 418 patients 65 years or older were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 298 patients were excluded (not frail [n = 290], unable to exercise [n = 3], and planned neoadjuvant treatment [n = 5]), and 120 frail patients (Fried Frailty Index,2) were randomized. Ten patients were excluded after randomization because they refused surgery (n = 3), died before surgery (n = 3), had no cancer (n = 1), had surgery without bowel resection (n = 1), or were switched to palliative care (n = 2). Hence, 110 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (55 in the prehabilitation [Prehab] and 55 in the rehabilitation [Rehab] groups). Data were analyzed from July 25 through August 21, 2019.

    Interventions  Multimodal program involving exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions initiated before (Prehab group) or after (Rehab group) surgery. All patients were treated within a standardized enhanced recovery pathway.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome included the Comprehensive Complications Index measured at 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were 30-day overall and severe complications, primary and total length of hospital stay, 30-day emergency department visits and hospital readmissions, recovery of walking capacity, and patient-reported outcome measures.

    Results  Of 110 patients randomized, mean (SD) age was 78 (7) years; 52 (47.3%) were men and 58 (52.7%) were women; 31 (28.2%) had rectal cancer; and 87 (79.1%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. There was no between-group difference in the primary outcome measure, 30-day Comprehensive Complications Index (adjusted mean difference, –3.2; 95% CI, –11.8 to 5.3; P = .45). Secondary outcome measures were also not different between groups.

    Conclusions and Relevance  In frail patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection (predominantly minimally invasive) within an enhanced recovery pathway, a multimodal prehabilitation program did not affect postoperative outcomes. Alternative strategies should be considered to optimize treatment of frail patients preoperatively.

    Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502760

    ×