[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 551
Citations 0
Editorial
March 25, 2020

JAMA Surgery—The Year in Review, 2019

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 3Editor, JAMA Surgery
JAMA Surg. Published online March 25, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0148

This was a truly exciting year for JAMA Surgery, as the journal experienced several notable accomplishments. First, as evidence of the high-quality scientific publications in JAMA Surgery, the impact factor rose from 8.5 to 10.7. This remarkable achievement reflects the hard work of our authors, peer reviewers,1 and editorial team. The impact factor of 10.7 positions JAMA Surgery as the number 1 ranked surgery journal in the world, a tremendous accomplishment. More importantly, JAMA Surgery is the first surgical journal to achieve a double-digit impact factor—a true accomplishment for the entire field of surgery.

In 2019, the acceptance rate was 15.6% for all article types, 5.5% for Original Investigations, and 14.4% for Research Letters. The journal’s most popular articles by views and downloads, news and social media coverage, and citations are listed in the Table.2-8

Table.  JAMA Surgery Statistics for 2019
JAMA Surgery Statistics for 2019

The web and social media presence for JAMA Surgery continues to be very strong under the leadership of Amalia Cochran, MD, the Web and Social Media Editor. More than 3.8 million articles were viewed and downloaded from the journal website in 2019. The journal’s electronic table of contents is delivered each week to more than 68 000 individuals. We currently have 30 900 Twitter followers, which represents a 22.6% increase in 2019, and 25 691 Facebook followers, which represents an 11.7% increase in 2019 (Table). Thus, between the electronic table of contents, visits to the journal website, social media reach, and print distribution, JAMA Surgery reaches more than 80 000 individuals weekly.

JAMA Surgery continues to promote the work of the authors through additional outlets. JAMA Surgery publishes author interview podcasts,9 and in 2019, we published 1 each month. These podcasts continue to be stimulating under the direction of Cochran, who brings a wonderful level of insight into the interview process with the authors. Articles published in JAMA Surgery had extensive press coverage, with 3461 media mentions in 2019 in outlets such as The New York Times, USA Today, CNN, NPR, and Forbes. In recognition of the press coverage, web, and social media support, articles in JAMA Surgery have done well with Altmetric scores. JAMA Surgery published 25 of the top 50 articles by Altmetric score among surgery journals, including the number 1 article.

In 2019, the journal also appreciated some other changes. JAMA Surgery started publishing short reviews of focused clinical topics under the JAMA Surgery Insights series, an effort led by Gerry Doherty, MD, the Review Editor. The journal also started publishing brief synopses of published guidelines written by experts in the field as part of the JAMA Surgery Clinical Guideline Synopsis series, an effort led by Pam Lipsett, MD, MHPE, the Clinical Education Editor. We hope that both of these new short article types will provide readers with the information they seek in a focused and evidence-based manner.

Lastly, I want to thank the readers, authors, peer reviewers, and editorial board for contributing to the journal. Through your support, we aim to fulfill our mission to promote the art and science of surgery by publishing relevant peer-reviewed research to assist surgeons in optimizing patient care and to serve as a forum for discussing issues pertinent to surgery, such as the education and training of the surgical workforce, quality improvement, and the ethics and economics of health care delivery.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Melina R. Kibbe, MD, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4041 Burnett-Womack, CB 7050 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (melina_kibbe@med.unc.edu).

Published Online: March 25, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0148

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
 JAMA Surgery peer reviewers in 2019.  JAMA Surg. Published online March 25, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0061Google Scholar
2.
Cooper  WO, Spain  DA, Guillamondegui  O,  et al.  Association of coworker reports about unprofessional behavior by surgeons with surgical complications in their patients.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(9):828-834. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1738PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Wood  MH, Carlin  AM, Ghaferi  AA,  et al.  Association of race with bariatric surgery outcomes.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(5):e190029. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0029PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Branch-Elliman  W, O’Brien  W, Strymish  J, Itani  K, Wyatt  C, Gupta  K.  Association of duration and type of surgical prophylaxis with antimicrobial-associated adverse events.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(7):590-598. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0569PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Engelman  DT, Ben Ali  W, Williams  JB,  et al.  Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(8):755-766. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Birenbaum  A, Hajage  D, Roche  S,  et al; IRIS Investigators Group.  Effect of cricoid pressure compared with a sham procedure in the rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: the IRIS randomized clinical trial.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):9-17. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3577PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Howard  R, Fry  B, Gunaseelan  V,  et al.  Association of opioid prescribing with opioid consumption after surgery in Michigan.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):e184234. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4234PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Stijns  RCH, de Graaf  EJR, Punt  CJA,  et al; CARTS Study Group.  Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of chemoradiotherapy followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery for distal rectal cancer: the CARTS study.  JAMA Surg. 2019;154(1):47-54. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3752PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
JAMA Network. JAMA Surgery author interviews. Accessed February 20, 2020. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/pages/jama-surgery-author-interviews
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×