The most powerful force in physician reimbursement is one of the least understood. Three times a year, the American Medical Association’s Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) quietly determines how many relative value units (RVUs) are attributed to every service that physicians can bill for. These RVUs determine what Medicare pays physicians for each Comprehensive Procedural Terminology code. To determine the value of each code, a survey asks practicing physicians to estimate how much work goes into each. These survey results are in turn discussed by the RUC members, who—it is worth mentioning—belong disproportionately to procedural specialties rather than primary care. Medicare accepts the RUC’s valuations nearly 90% of the time.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Chhabra KR, Dimick JB. Global Miscalculations—Relative Value Units and the Value of a Surgeon’s Care. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(6):502. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0423
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: