It is uncomfortable to acknowledge that our interpersonal interactions and experiences in the workplace are affected by gender. Traditional mantra tells us that gender (or skin color or religion or any other characteristic) should not influence our expectations, our assessment, or our treatment of any individual as a surgeon. This one-size-fits-all approach has existed, especially in surgical training, for a very long time. The problem with this, of course, is that the one size is not agnostic but rather reflects the traditional majority, and the rest of us have been expected to conform. To think otherwise requires an acknowledgement that interpersonal interactions and experiences vary by gender and as a result may require different approaches to training.1
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Greenberg CC, Greenberg JA. Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Surgical Training: Is It Really Women Residents We Need to Worry About? JAMA Surg. Published online May 20, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1561
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: