[Skip to Navigation]
Views 261
Citations 0
Comment & Response
May 27, 2020

Regionalization of Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Veterans Affairs/National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 2Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):787-788. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0859

In Reply We appreciate Søreide as well as Herb and Stitzenberg’s interest in our study1 that analyzed travel, optimal location, and centralization of hospitals performing pancreatic resection in California. Both letters highlight the concern that centralization can potentially lead to increased disparities among patients seeking care for surgical care. We agree with the authors that this is an important topic and warrants further discussion and consideration. While previous studies2 have suggested a possible added travel burden for certain subgroups of patients, to our knowledge, no study has specifically described what factors may be contributing to an increased burden. In fact, our group noted no differences in race/ethnicity or insurance type among patients who did or did not bypass a high-volume hospital.3,4 As such, certain vulnerable populations (eg, underrepresented minorities and/or low socioeconomic classes) may not have significant geospatial differences to high-volume centers, yet may be susceptible to other types of insurance-based or “narrow network” disparities.5 In addition, disparities may also be driven by other factors, such as knowledge, trust, perceptions of clinicians, and referral patterns.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×