[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
JAMA Network Clinical Guideline Synopsis
June 17, 2020

Review of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids

Author Affiliations
  • 1Vanderbilt University, Division of General Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal surgery, Nashville, Tennessee
JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):773-774. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0788
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    What grading system was used in the review of the ASCRS practice parameters on hemorrhoids
    Johannes Jongen, MD, EBSQ Coloproctology | Proctological Office Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    To the Editor:

    With great interest we read the review by Muldoon (ref. 1), updating the ASCRS guidelines on the management on hemorrhoids. Since we recently reviewed the quality of guidelines on hemorrhoids, published by the ASCRS, the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) and the German Society of Coloproctology (DGK), we are aware, that guidelines might be of different quality (ref.2). In the latter review, we evaluated the three guidelines with the AGREE-System (grading varies between lowest possible quality (1) and highest possible quality (7))(ref. 3). Of course all grading systems (the AGREE-system as well) are subjective for individual
    interpretation, therefor we are curious to know, what grading system was used in the table, mentioned in this publication. Were there only two qualifications: poor and good? This might be the reason, that the author rated the ASCRS guideline differently from what we found.

    Best regards

    Johannes Jongen, MD, FEBSQ Coloproctology, IntFASCRS
    Proctological Office Kiel, Kiel, Germany
    Email: j.jongen@gmx.de
    Sven Petersen, MD, PhD
    Dept. of General- and Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg Altona, Hamburg, Germany
    COI: JJ participated in the development of the European (ESCP) and and German (DGK) guidelines on hemorrhoids. SP has no disclosures to make.



    1. Muldoon R, Review of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. JAMA Surg. Published online June 17, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0788
    2. Petersen S, Holch P, Jongen J. Leitlinien zur Behandlung des Hämorrhoidalleidens Ein Vergleich. Coloproctology 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-019-00418-8
    3. AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 12:18–23
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: I participated in the development of the European (ESCP) and and German (DGK) guidelines on hemorrhoids.
    READ MORE
    ×