[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 165
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 1, 2020

Evidence-Based and Patient-Centered Decisions Regarding Bariatric Surgery—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 2Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle
JAMA Surg. Published online July 1, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1530

In Reply We thank Castillo-Castro et al for their comments and questions about our article.1 They are correct that the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) group at baseline was slightly younger (median age, 44 years in the SG group vs 46 years Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]), with fewer comorbid conditions (26% patients with diabetes in the SG group vs 44% in the RYGB group), and a lower body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; 46.8 SG vs 48.1 RYGB). In addition, the SG cases were performed later in the study, owing to time trends in procedure use, so the median follow-up was shorter for SG (2.2 years) than for RYGB (3.4 years). To account for these differences, our analyses adjusted for all baseline patient characteristics as well as the year of surgery, so the estimated comparison between RYGB and SG can be interpreted as the expected difference in outcome for a patient selecting SG vs RYGB, holding all other covariates constant. We did not include an interaction between year and procedure, so if the relative effect of RYGB vs SG changed over time, that would not be captured. While these approaches can address potential measured confounders in our study, there is still the potential for unobserved confounding owing to the nonrandomized study design. Finally, regarding follow-up time, we agree that additional comparative studies are needed with greater follow-up for both procedures to confirm our findings.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words