To the Editor We read with great interest the article by Babchenko and Gast.1 Speaking from the collective perspectives of both a female surgical resident and female cardiothoracic surgeon, we applaud the authors on their work delving into the potential effect of resident and faculty gender disparities on surgical training. We firmly agree that it is important to be aware of one’s own implicit and explicit biases and to not allow such beliefs to cloud one’s judgement of a trainee’s operative readiness nor his/her performance; however, we offer nuances to the authors’ suggestion of training female and male surgical residents differently.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Luc JGY, Antonoff MB. Training of Male and Female Surgical Residents. JAMA Surg. Published online July 29, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2436
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: