To the Editor I read with much interest the paper “Should We Train Female and Male Residents Slightly Differently?” by Babchenko and Gast.1 The authors seem to follow a new pedagogical attitude that hypothesizes a gender difference capability in surgical training deriving from socialization, implicit gender bias, and even hormonal influences. They conclude that it is important to consider how these differences are associated with surgical training, especially because studies have demonstrated a gender autonomy gap in residency. In my academic career, I have seen excellent capabilities in female surgical trainees, such as attention to details, punctuality, reliability, and kindness with patients.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Sterpetti AV. Training of Male and Female Surgical Residents. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(10):999–1000. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2439
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: