To the Editor We write to express grave concerns regarding the article, “Should We Train Female and Male Surgeons Slightly Differently?”1 We strongly disagree that female residents should be trained differently than their male counterparts. Since women in the United States gained the right to vote in 1919, the goal of gender rights advocacy has been equality: obtain equal pay for equal work, eliminate harassment, and eradicate stereotypes. We therefore believe it is not only hypocritical but also counterproductive to the fundamental pursuit of gender equality to suggest that female residents ought to be treated differently during surgical training. We simply cannot advocate for equal treatment regardless of gender with one breath and then request exceptions based on stereotypes in another.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Braun HJ, Ascher NL. Training of Male and Female Surgical Residents. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(10):1000–1001. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2442
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: