The study by Joh et al1 exposes substantial sex inequity in general surgical training in New Zealand. This finding was drawn from a data set of more than 119 000 procedures performed by trainees between 2013 and 2017.
Male and female trainees performed a similar number of cases overall; however, disaggregation of the data by sex revealed that female trainees performed statistically significantly fewer cases autonomously (ie, without a surgeon-supervisor scrubbed at the table).1 This inequity persisted despite controlling for factors relating to trainees and training environment and was seen for all procedure types. The difference was particularly marked for major procedures, where the odds ratio of a female trainee performing a case autonomously was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54-0.87; P = .002).
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Wright DM, Windsor JA. Sex Inequity in Surgical Training. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(11):1026–1027. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3022
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: