[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Invited Commentary
December 16, 2020

All Surgeons Are in This Together

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
JAMA Surg. 2021;156(3):254-255. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5671
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Support for a surgical community...
    Harald Aanning, MD | Retired general surgeon
    I'm sure we all agree with the authors: "We need to support each other when help is needed, collaborating on patients with difficult cases and picking up the phone or jumping on Zoom to communicate when our paths cross, to avoid redundancy and ensure optimal patient care—and hopefully nourish our vibrant surgical community..."

    But has anyone surveyed hospital administrators (and their leaders) to determine if they also support these critical needs of our surgical community?