Clinicians generally accept, almost without question, that patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis will experience improvement in their symptoms after the operation. We believe this with such confidence that it remains one of the so-called safe places in general surgery, away from controversy, drama, or questionable expectations. In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Latenstein and colleagues1 have nicely shown that—of course—it gets complicated.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Collins C, Poulose BK. Change to Helping Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis—Does Everybody Win With an Operation? JAMA Surg. 2021;156(10):e213723. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3723
Monkeypox Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.