How often are race and ethnicity reported for human study participants in surgical literature, and when race is reported, do authors follow the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for quality reporting?
In this study of 2485 articles published in 2019, the reporting of race and ethnicity was low at a mean (SD) of 32.5% (12.0) overall. There was no significant difference in the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting in publications from journals that state they follow ICMJE recommendations compared with those that do not explicitly claim adherence, but journals following ICMJE recommendations were more likely to follow the guidelines for quality reporting.
Increased frequency and improved standardization of race and ethnicity reporting is needed among publications from surgical journals.
The reporting of race provides transparency to the representativeness of data and helps inform health care disparities. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) developed recommendations to promote quality reporting of race; however, the frequency of reporting continues to be low among most medical journals.
To assess the frequency as well as quality of race reporting among publications from high-ranking broad-focused surgical research journals.
Design, Setting, and Participants
A literature review and bibliometric analysis was performed examining all human-based primary research articles published in 2019 from 7 surgical journals: JAMA Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Annals of Surgery, Surgery, American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, and Journal of Surgical Education. The 5 journals that stated they follow the ICMJE recommendations were analyzed against the 2 journals that did not explicitly claim adherence.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Measured study outcomes included race reporting frequency and use of the ICMJE recommendations for quality reporting of race.
A total of 2485 publications were included in the study. The mean (SD) frequency of reporting of race and ethnicity in publications of ICMJE vs non-ICMJE journals was 32.8% (8.4) and 32.0% (20.9), respectively (P = .72). Adherence to ICMJE recommendations for reporting race was more frequent in ICMJE journals than non-ICMJE journals (mean [SD] of 73.1% [17.8] vs 37.0% [10.2]; P < .001).
Conclusions and Relevance
The frequency of race and ethnicity reporting among surgical journals is low. A journal’s statement of adherence to ICMJE recommendations did not affect the frequency of race and ethnicity reporting; however, there was an increase in the use of ICMJE quality metrics. These findings suggest the need for increased and more standardized reporting of racial and ethnic demographic data among surgical journals.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Maduka RC, Broderick M, White EM, et al. The Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Surgery Literature. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(11):1036–1041. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3752
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.