Maduka et al highlight the need for consistent reporting of race and ethnicity in surgery literature in their study “The Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Surgery Literature.”1 The authors reviewed 2485 articles involving human-based studies published in 7 surgery journals in 2019. They found equally low rates of reporting race and ethnicity in journals that stated they follow the ICMJE recommendations and those that did not. The myriad causes for this finding include disproportionate representation in trials and the inability to gather the data from retrospective studies. The authors also identified the “failure to see relevance when compared to ‘biologically’ based subject demographics such as age or sex” as a contributor to the lack of reporting on race and ethnicity in these articles.1 This statement supports the need to consider the intersectionality between structural racism and health inequities.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Stewart JH. Now Is the Time for a Critical Conversation About the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(11):1042. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3753
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.