Every day we apply years of rigorous training to work in an extremely high-risk and litigious environment. Yet, in no other industry are consequential errors dealt with in such a haphazard, reactionary, and secluded manner.
Regrettably, research in patient safety has lagged behind surgeons' demand for it. That is, the area of safety has been plagued by a paucity of scholarship and data. In light of this deficit, Bilimoria et al have advanced the field by describing a standardized method to capture events and classify them in a systematic way. Commendably, they promote the science of safety by testing a defined intervention. In short, Bilimoria et al show how we can learn from mistakes in a more organized and comprehensive way. Most importantly, they uphold the key pillars of patient safety: evaluate systems, standardize processes, and learn from mistakes.
Makary MA. Development of an Online Morbidity, Mortality, and Near-Miss Reporting System to Identify Patterns of Adverse Events in Surgical Patients—Invited Critique. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):311. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.6
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: