IN RESECTION of the rectosigmoid region for carcinoma, it has been the practice of a large group of surgeons to remove the anus and the sphincter, substituting a colostomy opening; a smaller, but perhaps no less vocal, group believes that the sphincter can be retained without the penalty of a higher immediate or remote mortality. This amiable feud goes on and on, with concessions from either side, and in all fairness it can be said that both groups have honest convictions. I believe there is enough information available concerning many aspects of the subject to permit some rational decision.
Two questions naturally arise: First, is it possible to retain a functioning anal sphincter without materially increasing the risk of operation and, at the same time, maintain a record of five year cures comparable to that of the colostomizing operation? Second, can the operation be done with the assurance that a
WHITE CS. PRESERVATION OF THE ANAL SPHINCTER IN SURGICAL PROCEDURES IN THE RECTOSIGMOID REGION. Arch Surg. 1949;59(1):129–146. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1949.01240040132010
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: