Previous studies have indicated that the interposition of a short reversed small bowel segment after massive small bowel resection in dogs will prolong transit time and maintain better nutritional status.1-5 Using triolein 1131, Singleton et al3 found that fat absorption rose temporarily after interposition of a nine- to ten-inch reversed segment of ileum, but was unable to explain why the animals became cachectic and died after a three- to four-month period, with a gradual decrease of absorption levels. Stahlgren et al5 found that losses of water, fat, and nitrogen were decreased by the effects of a short antiperistaltic segment.
Recently, Gibson et al6 reported the successful use of a short reversed small bowel segment in an 80-year-old female patient who underwent resection of more than 90% of the intestine for occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery with gangrene of the bowel.
The present study of fat
SAKO K, GERSZI K, MARCHETTA FC. Nutritional Effects of A Short Reversed Jejunal Segment. Arch Surg. 1964;89(6):1102–1105. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1964.01320060170030
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: