[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
December 1971


Author Affiliations

Oak Park, Ill

Arch Surg. 1971;103(6):774. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350120138030

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.—I am writing in regards to the editorial in the Archives, "Women in Surgery" (102:234-235, 1971) by Dr. Carol C. Nadelson. Dr. Nadelson's editorial is correct up to a point. She states that in 1965, 17.4% of women in active practice were in the surgical specialties and 7.2% of these were in anesthesiology. It is impossible to speak for all anesthesiologists, but as a woman anesthesiologist, I do not consider myself to be in a surgical specialty, but rather a medical specialty, or perhaps a liaison between the two. If we assume that anesthesiology is a medical specialty, then Dr. Nadelson's argument is even more valid, since only 10.4% of women physicians are in surgical specialties.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview