[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
May 1974

Fracture Healing: Compression vs Fixation

Author Affiliations

From the Section of Orthopedics, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinic, Chicago.

Arch Surg. 1974;108(5):698-702. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1974.01350290062010

In a fracture healing experiment using rabbit tibiae, apparatus was used to produce a constant measured compression at the site of surgically produced fractures. The apparatus did not hold the fracture rigidly immobilized, but permitted a degree of motion. Under these conditions, compression itself was not a uniformly beneficial factor in fracture healing. In excess, compression acted adversely on the healing process, resulting in slower healing and a bulkier, less mature callus. Excess compression was also related to an adverse response in the diaphysis manifested by resorption of bone along Haversian canals with resultant diminution of structural substance of the cortex.