This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Samuel Johnson, who certainly should have known, stated: "No dictionary of a living tongue ever can be perfect, since while it is hastening to publication, some words are budding and some falling away.... Dictionaries are like watches: the worst is better than none, and the best cannot be expected to go quite true."
Since its debut 75 years ago, this lexicon has had 25 editions. I must confess that I have used the 22nd edition for the past 23 years without being aware that I was out of step with the times. Maybe we keep our old dictionaries because we feel comfortable with them, as we do with old friends, and perhaps we have a reluctance to discard them because we do not wish to admit the passing of time.
How can a reviewer assess a new dictionary? I am not sure, but I put it to some tests in
GOLDWYN RM. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. Arch Surg. 1975;110(2):226. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360080092025
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: