This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—The article by Chang and Farha on inguinal herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia (Arch Surg 112:1069-1071, 1977) presents needed and convincing evidence in favor of this approach, but neglects what in my experience has proved to be its most impressive by-product—the financial savings realized. A recent analysis of a personal series of 140 groin hernia repairs done under local anesthesia in a manner comparable to Chang and Farha's shows age ranges from 14 to 94 years, maximum postoperative stay of six days and minimum stay of 30 minutes, and three minor complications that did not delay discharge. Like Chang and Farha, my colleagues and I have had no pulmonary or urinary tract complications and have had 100% patient acceptance. Even the two of our own recurrences of which we are aware were repaired under local anesthesia at the patient's request. Ten repairs have been done on physicians, four
COE RC. Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Under Local Anesthesia. Arch Surg. 1978;113(7):905. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370190127030
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: