To the Editor.—McCubbin and Spratt stated in the Archives (115:224-228, 1980) that the no-touch isolation technique is without increased risk and they recommended its wider use in colon cancer. The unwary reader support its use are lacking. Turnbull et al1 believed that ligation of the lymphovascular pedicle prior to mobilization of the colon was responsible for their good results. However, examination of the figures from the article by Turnbull et al shows that the patients treated by the no-touch isolation technique had a longer segment of colon and accompanying mesenteric lymph nodes excised (a hemicolectomy) than "control" patients. Subsequently, Stearns and Shottenfeld2 reported similar good results without ligation before mobilization and attributed their results to the extent of resection that was comparable with that used by Turnbull et al. More recently, Busuttil et al3 have reported a comparable survival rate for carcinoma of the sigmoid colon
SPARKS FC. Nonproprietary Name and Trademark of Drug Cimetidine—Tagamet. No-Touch Isolation Technique: Caveat Emptor. Arch Surg. 1980;115(9):1136. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380090100026
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: