• The objectives of surgery for generalized peritonitis are to eliminate the source of continual bacterial contamination and to prevent septicemia and intra-abdominal abscess formation. A prospective randomized study of three different operative approaches of treating residual peritoneal contamination was undertaken: group 1, no peritoneal irrigation (14 patients); group 2, intraoperative peritoneal irrigation only (15 patients); group 3, both intraoperative and postoperative peritoneal irrigation (15 patients). The mortality in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 28.5%, 26.6%, and 33%, respectively. The overall incidence of septicemia and intra-abdominal abscesses in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 23%, 22%, and 17%, respectively. In those patients who survived, the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infection, and septicemia was 6%, 23%, and 13%, respectively. In this series, there was no detectable difference in the mortality and infectious complications between the three treatment groups. The only clinical factors that adversely affected mortality and morbidity were peritonitis originating from the colon and age greater than 60 years. Early surgical intervention with removal of the source of peritonitis, debridement of all necrotic tissue, and drainage of abscesses remain the cornerstones of successful therapy in generalized peritonitis.
(Arch Surg 1982;117:209-212)
Hunt JL. Generalized Peritonitis: To Irrigate or Not to Irrigate the Abdominal Cavity. Arch Surg. 1982;117(2):209–212. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380260075013
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: