• In an open, prospective, and randomized investigation on the prophylactic efficacy of peroral neomycin sulfate–erythromycin base vs intravenous ceftriaxone-metronidazole preparation in colorectal surgery, no significantly diverging results between regimens were recorded (1/27 [3.7%] and 2/27 [7.4%] wound infections, respectively). Commentary is made about the diverging results from earlier studies on antimicrobial prophylaxis and on the multifactorial causality of surgical infection. We believe that variables such as physical condition of the patients, virulence and local resistance patterns of bacteria, and technical skill of the surgeons are far more important in regard to the postoperative outcome concerning septic complications than is the choice of proper antibiotics. Thus, to determine the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis, we call for larger investigations in the future, preferably double-blind, where it is possible to better control and diminish the influence of determinants other than the antibiotics being compared.
(Arch Surg 1989;124:705-707)
Kling P, Dahlgren S. Oral Prophylaxis With Neomycin and Erythromycin in Colorectal SurgeryMore Proof for Efficacy Than Failure. Arch Surg. 1989;124(6):705–707. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410060075015