To examine the role of conservative, nonexcisional methods in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
Pilot nonrandomized cohort study and follow-up retrospective study.
Setting and Patients:
In the pilot study, all patients treated for pilonidal sinus disease consecutively over 3 years at an Army community hospital, and in the follow-up study within a closed federal population, all patients admitted with a diagnosis of pilonidal sinus disease over 17 years to an Army medical center.
Conservative, nonexcisional therapy (meticulous hair control by natal cleft shaving, improved perineal hygiene, and limited lateral incision and drainage for abscess) with initial comparison to excisional procedures.
Main Outcome Measures:
Occupied-bed days for conservative vs excisional therapy during a 3-year pilot study and the number of admissions and procedures performed for pilonidal sinus disease at an institution dedicated to conservative treatment alone.
Complete healing over 83 occupied-bed days was demonstrated in 101 consecutive cases managed during 1 year with the conservative method, whereas slower healing over 4760 occupied-bed days was observed in 229 patients undergoing 240 operative procedures during the preceding 2 years. With application of conservative treatment over 17 years, only 23 excisional operations were performed.
Conservative therapy effectively controls pilonidal sinus disease in the nonoperative outpatient setting while promoting near-normal work status and is preferred over excisional operations.(Arch Surg. 1994;129:914-918)
Armstrong JH, Barcia PJ. Pilonidal Sinus Disease: The Conservative Approach. Arch Surg. 1994;129(9):914–918. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420330028006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: