[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 1996

Invited Commentary

Author Affiliations

Chicago, Ill

Arch Surg. 1996;131(1):101. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430130103023

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy are worthy of study because patients who undergo conversion are deprived of the advantages of the laparoscopic technique, including shorter hospital stay, earlier return to full activity, less pain, and the absence of a large scar. Surgeons who perform cholecystectomy have witnessed the disappointment of patients and their families when conversion is necessary.

The authors found that conversion was significantly more frequent in patients who were obese, older than 65 years, had a thickened gallbladder wall, or had cholecystectomy as an interval procedure for acute cholecystitis. All of these factors but age could make the identification of important anatomic structures difficult. The need for conversion was also significantly higher for senior surgeons and during the early portion of a surgeon's experience with the procedure. Obviously, inexperience can produce complications. Perhaps the presumably wiser senior surgeons perform conversions more quickly. We hope

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview