Predictors of Outcome for Anal Fistula Surgery | Surgery | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Hamadani A, Haigh PI, Liu IL, Abbas MA. Who is at risk for developing chronic anal fistula or recurrent anal sepsis after initial perianal abscess?  Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(2):217-22119279415PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Rosa G, Lolli P, Piccinelli D, Mazzola F, Bonomo S. Fistula in ano: anatomoclinical aspects, surgical therapy and results in 844 patients.  Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10(3):215-22116969614PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Anal fistula surgery: factors associated with recurrence and incontinence.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(7):723-7298674361PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
van Koperen PJ, Wind J, Bemelman WA, Bakx R, Reitsma JB, Slors JF. Long-term functional outcome and risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatment for low and high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(10):1475-148118626715PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1194-11977995143PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH. Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28(4):225-2313979223PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Kiriu T,  et al.  Factors affecting continence after fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula-in-ano.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(9):1071-107517262199PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Lindsey I, Jones OM, Smilgin-Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Patterns of fecal incontinence after anal surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(10):1643-164915540293PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Hyman N, O’Brien S, Osler T. Outcomes after fistulotomy: results of a prospective, multicenter regional study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(12):2022-202719934925PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Tanaka Y,  et al.  Non–sphincter splitting fistulectomy vs conventional fistulotomy for high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective functional and manometric study.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(9):1097-110217294195PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Abbas MA, Lemus-Rangel R, Hamadani A. Long-term outcome of endorectal advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulae.  Am Surg. 2008;74(10):921-92418942614PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Jun SH, Choi GS. Anocutaneous advancement flap closure of high anal fistulas.  Br J Surg. 1999;86(4):490-49210215820PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP,  et al.  Repair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(7):944-95010910240PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Champagne BJ, O’Connor LM, Ferguson M, Orangio GR, Schertzer ME, Armstrong DN. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of cryptoglandular fistulas: long-term follow-up.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(12):1817-182117082891PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lawes DA, Efron JE, Abbas M, Heppell J, Young-Fadok TM. Early experience with the bioabsorbable anal fistula plug.  World J Surg. 2008;32(6):1157-115918373120PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Zbar AP, Ramesh J, Beer-Gabel M, Salazar R, Pescatori M. Conventional cutting vs internal anal sphincter-preserving seton for high trans-sphincteric fistula: a prospective randomized manometric and clinical trial.  Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7(2):89-9414605927PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.  J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(3):581-58617427539PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):39-4220010348PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Bleier JI, Moloo H, Goldberg SM. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract: an effective new technique for complex fistulas.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):43-4620010349PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Cavanaugh M, Hyman N, Osler T. Fecal incontinence severity index after fistulotomy: a predictor of quality of life.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(3):349-35312068193PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Roig JV, Jordán J, García-Armengol J, Esclapez P, Solana A. Changes in anorectal morphologic and functional parameters after fistula-in-ano surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(8):1462-146919617761PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Koehler A, Risse-Schaaf A, Athanasiadis S. Treatment for horseshoe fistulas-in-ano with primary closure of the internal fistula opening: a clinical and manometric study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11):1874-188215622580PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Pezim ME. Successful treatment of horseshoe fistula requires deroofing of deep postanal space.  Am J Surg. 1994;167(5):513-5158185039PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O,  et al.  Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure?  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(12):1616-162112473884PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Christoforidis D, Pieh MC, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or collagen fistula plug: a comparative study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):18-2219273951PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Ortiz H, Marzo J, Ciga MA, Oteiza F, Armendáriz P, de Miguel M. Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano.  Br J Surg. 2009;96(6):608-61219402190PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Loungnarath R, Dietz DW, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Fibrin glue treatment of complex anal fistulas has low success rate.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(4):432-43614978618PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RK,  et al.  Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(9):1167-117412972959PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Sentovich SM. Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(4):498-50212682544PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Wang JY, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sternberg JA, Abel ME, Varma MG. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas: are fistula plugs an acceptable alternative?  Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):692-69719404076PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Paper
Sep 2011

Predictors of Outcome for Anal Fistula Surgery

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Arch Surg. 2011;146(9):1011-1016. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.197
Abstract

Objectives To review our experience with patients treated for anal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular disease and to determine factors that influence postoperative outcome.

Design Retrospective review.

Setting A regional tertiary referral center.

Patients Adult patients with anal fistula secondary to cryptoglandular disease.

Interventions Fistulotomy, advancement flap, and fistula plugging.

Main Outcome Measures Rates of operative failure (persistent fistula), incontinence, and septic complications. We evaluated age, sex, previous operation, fistula type, number of fistula tracts, horseshoe fistula, and intervention type to determine their independent influence on outcomes.

Results One hundred seventy-nine patients (79.3% male) underwent fistula operation from October 1, 2003, through December 31, 2008. Median age was 45 years. Fistulotomy was undertaken in 82.7% of patients, advancement flap in 10.6%, and plugging in 6.7%. The rates of operative failure, postoperative incontinence, and septic complications were 15.6%, 15.6%, and 7.3%, respectively. Plugging carried the highest failure rate (83.3%) compared with fistulotomy (10.1%) (odds ratio [OR], 44.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.9-221.0; P < .001]) and was the only independent predictor for failure after adjusting for all variables. Being older than 45 years was associated with a higher postoperative incontinence rate compared with the younger group (adjusted OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.0-7.7; P = .04]). High transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas were predictors of incontinence compared with subcutaneous fistulas (adjusted OR, 22.9 [95% CI, 2.2-242.0; P = .009] and 61.5 [4.5-844.0; P = .002], respectively). The only predictor of septic complications was plugging compared with fistulotomy (adjusted OR, 15.1 [95% CI, 2.3-97.7; P = .004]).

Conclusions Fistulotomy is the preferred operation for anal fistula. Plugging is associated with the highest operative failure and septic complication rates. Incontinence was influenced more by fistula type and age rather than procedure.

×