Efficacy of the Omental Roll-up Technique in Pancreaticojejunostomy as a Strategy to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy | Gastroenterology | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Abe N, Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y,  et al.  Falciform ligament in pancreatoduodenectomy for protection of skeletonized and divided vessels.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(2):184-18819169616PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Kapoor VK, Sharma A, Behari A, Singh RK. Omental flaps in pancreaticoduodenectomy.  JOP. 2006;7(6):608-61517095840PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Sakamoto Y, Shimada K, Esaki M, Kajiwara T, Sano T, Kosuge T. Wrapping the stump of the gastroduodenal artery using the falciform ligament during pancreaticoduodenectomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):334-33617254940PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Satoi S, Takai S, Matsui Y,  et al.  Less morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy of patients with pancreatic cancer.  Pancreas. 2006;33(1):45-5216804412PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Choi SB, Park SW, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ. The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection.  J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(6):335-34219226533PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu S,  et al.  Coil embolization of bleeding visceral pseudoaneurysms following pancreatectomy: the importance of early angiography.  Arch Surg. 1998;133(10):1099-11029790208PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E,  et al.  Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors.  Am J Surg. 2009;197(6):702-70918778804PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
van Berge Henegouwen MI, Allema JH, van Gulik TM, Verbeek PC, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery.  Br J Surg. 1995;82(11):1527-15318535810PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Maeda A, Ebata T, Kanemoto H,  et al.  Omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy for protection of splanchnic vessels.  World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1122-112616132400PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G,  et al; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.  Surgery. 2005;138(1):8-1316003309PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C,  et al.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition.  Surgery. 2007;142(1):20-2517629996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C,  et al.  Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).  Surgery. 2007;142(5):761-76817981197PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM,  et al.  External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):425-433Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Abe N, Sugiyama M, Yanagida O, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Wrapping of skeletonized and divided vessels using the falciform ligament in distal pancreatectomy.  Am J Surg. 2007;194(1):94-9717560917PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S,  et al.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Am J Surg. 2010;199(6):759-76420074698PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S,  et al; French Associations for Surgical Research.  Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.  Surgery. 2006;139(5):591-59816701090PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Lermite E, Pessaux P, Brehant O,  et al.  Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(4):588-59617382217PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(8):951-95915585382PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Frymerman AS, Schuld J, Ziehen P,  et al.  Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on surgical outcome—the need for a classification-driven risk management.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(4):711-71820094814PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Tsuji M, Kimura H, Konishi K, Yabushita K, Maeda K, Kuroda Y. Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreaticoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients.  Surgery. 1998;123(6):617-6219626311PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Takano S, Ito Y, Watanabe Y, Yokoyama T, Kubota N, Iwai S. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Br J Surg. 2000;87(4):423-42710759736PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Wellner U, Makowiec F, Fischer E, Hopt UT, Keck T. Reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(4):745-75119083070PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Yoshimi F, Ono H, Asato Y,  et al.  Internal stenting of the hepaticojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy to promote earlier discharge from hospital.  Surg Today. 1996;26(8):665-6678855507PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Kurosaki I, Hatakeyama K. Omental wrapping of skeletonized major vessels after pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Int Surg. 2004;89(2):90-9415285241PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Moriura S, Ikeda S, Ikezawa T, Naiki K. The inclusion of an omental flap in pancreatoduodenectomy.  Surg Today. 1994;24(10):940-9417894198PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Katsikas D, Sechas M, Antypas G,  et al.  Beneficial effect of omental wrapping of unsafe intestinal anastomoses: an experimental study in dogs.  Int Surg. 1977;62(8):435-437903206PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(8):731-7381379531PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
Feb 2012

Efficacy of the Omental Roll-up Technique in Pancreaticojejunostomy as a Strategy to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul.

Arch Surg. 2012;147(2):145-150. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.865
Abstract

Background Most morbidity and mortality are caused by a pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and its prevention is the major concern. We applied the omental roll-up technique around pancreaticojejunostomy and investigated the effectiveness of this technique to prevent a pancreatic fistula.

Design Retrospective study.

Setting Tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreas surgery clinic, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul.

Patients Between March 1, 2009, and March 31, 2011, 68 patients underwent PD. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical application of the omental roll-up technique around the PJ site: group 1 (those who did not undergo the omental roll-up technique) compared with group 2 (those who did undergo the omental roll-up technique).

Main Outcome Measure The occurrence of a pancreatic fistula.

Results No differences were noted in the clinical characteristics, including patients' demographics and operation-related factors, between the 2 groups. A pancreatic fistula occurred in 23 of 39 patients in group 1 (59%) and in 6 of 29 patients in group 2 (20.7%). Group 2 had a significantly lower incidence of pancreatic fistula (P = .002), and these fistulas were classified as being grade A using the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition showing a transient high amylase level in the drainage fluid without significantly affecting the patient's recovery. Drain removal was performed earlier in group 2 (P < .001). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 23.4 days in group 1 compared with 15.9 days in group 2 (P = .009). Overall mortality was 1.5%; however, no deaths were related to a pancreatic fistula.

Conclusions The omental roll-up technique for the PJ site definitely reduced the occurrence of a pancreatic fistula. Therefore, the omental roll-up technique is a simple and effective strategy to prevent a pancreatic fistula.

×