Effect of Laparoscopy on the Risk of Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Population-Based Register Study | Gastroenterology | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Foster NM, McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Small bowel obstruction: a population-based appraisal.  J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(2):170-17616864029PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Etiology of small bowel obstruction.  Am J Surg. 2000;180(1):33-3611036136PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN,  et al.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.  Lancet. 1999;353(9163):1476-148010232313PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Holmdahl L. Making and covering of surgical footprints.  Lancet. 1999;353(9163):1456-145710232305PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.  Am J Surg. 1973;126(3):345-3534580750PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Sajja SB, Schein M. Early postoperative small bowel obstruction.  Br J Surg. 2004;91(6):683-69115164435PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D,  et al; Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) Group.  Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion-related complications.  Colorectal Dis. 2004;6(6):506-51115521944PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Ivarsson ML, Holmdahl L, Franzén G, Risberg B. Cost of bowel obstruction resulting from adhesions.  Eur J Surg. 1997;163(9):679-6849311475PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Ellis H, Crowe A. Medico-legal consequences of post-operative intra-abdominal adhesions.  Int J Surg. 2009;7(3):187-19119389492PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D,  et al; Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research (SCAR) Group.  The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(6):551-55816232234PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Clark D,  et al; Surgical and Clinical Research (SCAR) Group.  Adhesion-related readmissions following gynaecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24 046 patients.  Hum Reprod. 2004;19(8):1877-188515178659PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Schnüriger B, Barmparas G, Branco BC, Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature.  Am J Surg. 2011;201(1):111-12120817145PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Büchler MW. Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery?  Surg Endosc. 2004;18(6):898-90615108105PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Dowson HM, Bong JJ, Lovell DP, Worthington TR, Karanjia ND, Rockall TA. Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg. 2008;95(7):909-91418509861PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR,  et al.  Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial.  Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):70-7820013936PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Duron JJ, Hay JM, Msika S,  et al; French Association for Surgical Research.  Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicenter study.  Arch Surg. 2000;135(2):208-21210668883PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Schölin J, Buunen M, Hop W,  et al.  Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.  Surg Endosc. 2011;25(12):3755-376021667207PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF. Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program.  Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):596-60119300230PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Janson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B, Haglind E. Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.  Surg Endosc. 2007;21(5):747-75317342556PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC,  et al; Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.  Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44-5219071061PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P,  et al.  Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.  Br J Surg. 2004;91(4):409-41715048739PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
The National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden.  Kodningskvalitet i patientregistret—Slutenvård 2008 [Coding Quality in Patient Register—Inpatient 2008] [in Swedish]. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2010/2010-6-27. Accessed January 23, 2012
23.
Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A,  et al.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.  BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):45021658213PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Duron JJ, Silva NJ, du Montcel ST,  et al.  Adhesive postoperative small bowel obstruction: incidence and risk factors of recurrence after surgical treatment: a multicenter prospective study.  Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):750-75717060768PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Menzies D, Parker M, Hoare R, Knight A. Small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions: treatment patterns and associated costs in 110 hospital admissions.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83(1):40-4611212449PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Owens M, Barry M, Janjua AZ, Winter DC. A systematic review of laparo-scopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery.  Surgeon. 2011;9(4):218-22421672662PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC,  et al; COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR).  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.  Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477-48415992696PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Tang B, Cuschieri A. Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk fac-tors and effects on patient outcome.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(7):1081-109116843880PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Van Der Krabben AA, Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, Schaapveld M, Van Goor H. Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy.  Br J Surg. 2000;87(4):467-47110759744PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Tucker ON, Escalante-Tattersfield T, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. The ABC System: a simplified classification system for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.  Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1549-155418040752PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
Apr 2012

Effect of Laparoscopy on the Risk of Small-Bowel Obstruction: A Population-Based Register Study

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Gothenburg (Drs Angenete, Gellerstedt, and Haglind); Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg (Drs Angenete and Haglind); and Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm (Mr Jacobsson), Sweden.

Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):359-365. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.31
Abstract

Objective To investigate the incidence and risk factors for small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after certain surgical procedures.

Design A population-based retrospective register study.

Setting Small-bowel obstruction causes considerable patient suffering. Risk factors for SBO have been identified, but the effect of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic) on the incidence of SBO has not been fully elucidated.

Patients The Inpatient Register held by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare was used. The hospital discharge diagnoses and registered performed surgical procedures identified data for cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, bowel resection, anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, rectopexy, appendectomy, and bariatric surgery performed from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2004. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, and death were collected.

Main Outcome Measures Episodes of hospital stay and surgery for SBO within 5 years after the index surgery.

Results A total of 108 141 patients were included. The incidence of SBO ranged from 0.4% to 13.9%. Multivariate analysis revealed age, previous surgery, comorbidity, and surgical technique to be risk factors for SBO. Laparoscopy exceeded other risk factors in reduction of the risk of SBO for most of the surgical procedures.

Conclusions Open surgery seems to increase the risk of SBO at least 4 times compared with laparoscopy for most of the abdominal surgical procedures studied. Other factors such as age, previous abdominal surgery, and comorbidity are also of importance.

×