Risk and Cost-effectiveness of Surveillance Followed by Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Polyps | Hepatobiliary Cancer | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Myers RP, Shaffer EA, Beck PL. Gallbladder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16(3):187-19411930198PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.  N Engl J Med. 1994;330(6):403-4088284007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA,  et al.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.  Ann Surg. 1996;224(5):609-6208916876PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Singh K, Ohri A. Anatomic landmarks: their usefulness in safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Surg Endosc. 2006;20(11):1754-175817001444PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Debru E, Dawson A, Leibman S,  et al.  Does routine intraoperative cholangiography prevent bile duct transection?  Surg Endosc. 2005;19(4):589-59315759189PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Waage A, Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry.  Arch Surg. 2006;141(12):1207-121317178963PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I,  et al.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies.  Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):986-99216230550PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B. Iatrogenic biliary injury: 13,305 cholecystectomies experienced by a single surgical team over more than 13 years.  Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):1077-108618210186PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Karvonen J, Gullichsen R, Laine S, Salminen P, Grönroos JM. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution.  Surg Endosc. 2007;21(7):1069-107317514397PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B. Incidental carcinoma gall bladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease.  Surg Endosc. 2009;23(9):2041-204618443860PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Weinstein D, Herbert M, Bendet N, Sandbank J, Halevy A. Incidental finding of gallbladder carcinoma.  Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4(5):334-33612040819PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Amanullah MK, Rizwn AK, Shahid S, Veena M. Occult carcinoma of gallbladder: incidence and role of simple cholecystectomy.  JK Pract. 2007;14:22-23Google Scholar
13.
Morera Ocón FJ, Ballestín Vicente J, Ripoll Orts F,  et al.  Gallbladder cancer in a regional hospital [in Spanish].  Cir Esp. 2009;86(4):219-22319695566PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Mittal R, Jesudason MR, Nayak S. Selective histopathology in cholecystectomy for gallstone disease.  Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29(1):26-3020373083PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Shrestha R, Tiwari M, Ranabhat SK, Aryal G, Rauniyar SK, Shrestha HG. Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: value of routine histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens.  Nepal Med Coll J. 2010;12(2):90-9421222405PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Kozuka S, Tsubone N, Yasui A, Hachisuka K. Relation of adenoma to carcinoma in the gallbladder.  Cancer. 1982;50(10):2226-22347127263PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Featherstone H, Witham L. The cost of cancer. Policy Exchange website. http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/category/item/the-cost-of-cancer. Accessed June 28, 2012
18.
Office for National Statistics.  Cancer Statistics Registrations: Registrations of Cancer Diagnosed in 2008. England (PDF 544KB) MB1 No. 38. London, England: Office for National Statistics; 2010
19.
Maddams J, Brewster D, Gavin A,  et al.  Cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom: estimates for 2008.  Br J Cancer. 2009;101(3):541-54719568236PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors.  Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1591-160216397865PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Solly J, Bunce C, Cowley S. Focus on: cholecystectomy—a guide for commissioners. www.institute.nhs.uk. Accessed February 2012
22.
Cha BH, Hwang JH, Lee SH,  et al.  Pre-operative factors that can predict neoplastic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.  World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(17):2216-222221633532PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Choi SY, Kim TS, Kim HJ,  et al.  Is it necessary to perform prophylactic cholecystectomy for asymptomatic subjects with gallbladder polyps and gallstones?  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(6):1099-110420594225PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Kwon W, Jang JY, Lee SE, Hwang DW, Kim SW. Clinicopathologic features of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder and risk factors of gallbladder cancer.  J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(3):481-48719543513PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Ito H, Hann LE, D’Angelica M,  et al.  Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: diagnosis and followup.  J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(4):570-57519476792PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Park JY, Hong SP, Kim YJ,  et al.  Long-term follow up of gallbladder polyps.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(2):219-22219054258PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Shin SR, Lee JK, Lee KH,  et al.  Can the growth rate of a gallbladder polyp predict a neoplastic polyp?  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43(9):865-86819398929PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Choi JH, Yun JW, Kim YS,  et al.  Pre-operative predictive factors for gallbladder cholesterol polyps using conventional diagnostic imaging.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(44):6831-683419058309PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Akyürek N, Salman B, Irkörücü O, Sare M, Tatlicioğlu E. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of true gallbladder polyps: the contradiction in the literature.  HPB (Oxford). 2005;7(2):155-15818333181PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Jang JY, Kim SW, Lee SE,  et al.  Differential diagnostic and staging accuracies of high resolution ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and multidetector computed tomography for gallbladder polypoid lesions and gallbladder cancer.  Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):943-94919855259PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Cheon YK, Cho WY, Lee TH,  et al.  Endoscopic ultrasonography does not differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic small gallbladder polyps.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(19):2361-236619452579PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Park KW, Kim SH, Choi SH, Lee WJ. Differentiation of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger with multi-detector row computed tomography.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34(1):135-13920118736PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Corwin MT, Siewert B, Sheiman RG, Kane RA. Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: is follow-up necessary? long-term clinical and US analysis of 346 patients.  Radiology. 2011;258(1):277-28220697115PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Kratzer W, Haenle MM, Voegtle A,  et al; Roemerstein Study Group.  Ultrasonographically detected gallbladder polyps: a reason for concern? a seven-year follow-up study.  BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:4118793401PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Lin WR, Lin DY, Tai DI,  et al.  Prevalence of and risk factors for gallbladder polyps detected by ultrasonography among healthy Chinese: analysis of 34 669 cases.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(6):965-96917725602PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Karlsen TH, Schrumpf E, Boberg KM. Gallbladder polyps in primary sclerosing cholangitis: not so benign.  Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24(3):395-39918408471PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Buckles DC, Lindor KD, Larusso NF, Petrovic LM, Gores GJ. In primary sclerosing cholangitis, gallbladder polyps are frequently malignant.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(5):1138-114212014717PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Aldouri AQ, Malik HZ, Waytt J,  et al.  The risk of gallbladder cancer from polyps in a large multiethnic series.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(1):48-5118339513PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Article
ONLINE FIRST
Dec 2012

Risk and Cost-effectiveness of Surveillance Followed by Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Polyps

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, England.

Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1078-1083. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.1948
Abstract

Objective To ascertain the best management options for patients presenting with gallbladder polyps.

Design Retrospective case-note analysis.

Setting Tertiary referral teaching hospital practice.

Patients Patients with ultrasonography-detected gallbladder polyps.

Interventions Ultrasonography surveillance or surgery.

Main Outcome Measures Demographic data and size and number of polyps were recorded as well as size increase and histological findings. Detection rates for potentially neoplastic and frankly neoplastic polyps were recorded and compared with complication rates from cholecystectomy. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasonography surveillance was examined.

Results Nine hundred eighty-six patients were identified and 467 patients underwent further follow-up. Only 6.6% of polyps exhibited an increase in size over the surveillance period. Polyps that subsequently progressed in size on surveillance had a significantly greater diameter at first presentation than those polyps that remained static (7 mm vs 5 mm, respectively) (P < .05). Only 3.7% of resected polyps had malignant or potentially malignant histology. Size greater than 10 mm and increase in size during surveillance predicted neoplastic potential.

Conclusions A surveillance with or without selective surgery policy could potentially detect and prevent 5.4 gallbladder cancers per 1000 individuals per year with a cost saving of more than £130 000 (US $201 676) per year. Cancer prevention benefits would exceed the risk ratios from cholecystectomy complications. Polyps greater than 10 mm should be resected; those between 5 and 10 mm should be under ultrasonography surveillance.

×