Positive and Negative Volume-Outcome Relationships in the Geriatric Trauma Population | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2013.
2.
MacKenzie  EJ, Morris  JA  Jr, Smith  GS, Fahey  M.  Acute hospital costs of trauma in the United States: implications for regionalized systems of care.  J Trauma. 1990;30(9):1096-1101, discussion 1101-1103.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Haas  B, Gomez  D, Xiong  W, Ahmed  N, Nathens  AB.  External benchmarking of trauma center performance: have we forgotten our elders?  Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):144-150.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Bradburn  E, Rogers  FB, Krasne  M,  et al.  High-risk geriatric protocol: improving mortality in the elderly [published correction appears in J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(4):1035].  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2):435-440.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Goodmanson  NW, Rosengart  MR, Barnato  AE, Sperry  JL, Peitzman  AB, Marshall  GT.  Defining geriatric trauma: when does age make a difference?  Surgery. 2012;152(4):668-674, discussion 674-675.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Morris  JA  Jr, MacKenzie  EJ, Damiano  AM, Bass  SM.  Mortality in trauma patients: the interaction between host factors and severity.  J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1476-1482.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Taylor  MD, Tracy  JK, Meyer  W, Pasquale  M, Napolitano  LM.  Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome.  J Trauma. 2002;53(3):407-414.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Labib  N, Nouh  T, Winocour  S,  et al.  Severely injured geriatric population: morbidity, mortality, and risk factors.  J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1908-1914.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Jacobs  DG, Plaisier  BR, Barie  PS,  et al; EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group.  Practice management guidelines for geriatric trauma: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group.  J Trauma. 2003;54(2):391-416.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rogers  A, Rogers  F, Bradburn  E,  et al.  Old and undertriaged: a lethal combination.  Am Surg. 2012;78(6):711-715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Ryb  GE, Cooper  C, Waak  SM.  Delayed trauma team activation: patient characteristics and outcomes.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):695-698.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Nathens  AB, Rivara  FP, Wang  J, Mackenzie  EJ, Jurkovich  GJ.  Variation in the rates of do not resuscitate orders after major trauma and the impact of intensive care unit environment.  J Trauma. 2008;64(1):81-88, discussion 88-91.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Adams  SD, Cotton  BA, Wade  CE,  et al.  Do not resuscitate status, not age, affects outcomes after injury: an evaluation of 15,227 consecutive trauma patients.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1327-1330.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Luft  HS, Bunker  JP, Enthoven  AC.  Should operations be regionalized? the empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.  N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364-1369.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Birkmeyer  JD, Siewers  AE, Finlayson  EV,  et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128-1137.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Birkmeyer  JD, Stukel  TA, Siewers  AE, Goodney  PP, Wennberg  DE, Lucas  FL.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.  N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117-2127.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Khuri  SF, Daley  J, Henderson  W,  et al.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.  Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):414-429, discussion 429-432.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Nathens  AB, Jurkovich  GJ, Maier  RV,  et al.  Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes.  JAMA. 2001;285(9):1164-1171.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
London  JA, Battistella  FD.  Is there a relationship between trauma center volume and mortality?  J Trauma. 2003;54(1):16-24, discussion 24-25.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Demetriades  D, Martin  M, Salim  A, Rhee  P, Brown  C, Chan  L.  The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries.  Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):512-517, discussion 517-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Bennett  KM, Vaslef  S, Pappas  TN, Scarborough  JE.  The volume-outcomes relationship for United States level I trauma centers.  J Surg Res. 2011;167(1):19-23.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Marx  WH, Simon  R, O’Neill  P,  et al.  The relationship between annual hospital volume of trauma patients and in-hospital mortality in New York State.  J Trauma. 2011;71(2):339-345, discussion 345-346.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Pandya  SR, Yelon  JA, Sullivan  TS, Risucci  DA.  Geriatric motor vehicle collision survival: the role of institutional trauma volume.  J Trauma. 2011;70(6):1326-1330.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0121.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2013.
25.
Lenartowicz  M, Parkovnick  M, McFarlan  A,  et al.  An evaluation of a proactive geriatric trauma consultation service.  Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):1098-1101.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation. http://ptsf.org. Accessed April 28, 2013.
27.
LaPar  DJ, Kron  IL, Jones  DR, Stukenborg  GJ, Kozower  BD.  Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.  Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):606-615.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Ghaferi  AA, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery.  Med Care. 2011;49(12):1076-1081.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Ghaferi  AA, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in Medicare patients.  Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):1029-1034.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Ghaferi  AA, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery.  N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1368-1375.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Glance  LG, Dick  AW, Meredith  JW, Mukamel  DB.  Variation in hospital complication rates and failure-to-rescue for trauma patients.  Ann Surg. 2011;253(4):811-816.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Haas  B, Gomez  D, Hemmila  MR, Nathens  AB.  Prevention of complications and successful rescue of patients with serious complications: characteristics of high-performing trauma centers.  J Trauma. 2011;70(3):575-582.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Kardooni  S, Haut  ER, Chang  DC,  et al.  Hazards of benchmarking complications with the National Trauma Data Bank: numerators in search of denominators.  J Trauma. 2008;64(2):273-277, discussion 277-279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Baztán  JJ, Suárez-García  FM, López-Arrieta  J, Rodríguez-Mañas  L, Rodríguez-Artalejo  F.  Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis.  BMJ. 2009;338:b50.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Charlson  ME, Pompei  P, Ales  KL, MacKenzie  CR.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.  J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
SURGICAL CARE OF THE AGING POPULATION
April 2014

Positive and Negative Volume-Outcome Relationships in the Geriatric Trauma Population

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
  • 3Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(4):319-326. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4834
Abstract

Importance  In trauma populations, improvements in outcome are documented in institutions with higher case volumes. However, it is not known whether improved outcomes are attributable to the case volume within specific higher-risk groups, such as the elderly, or to the case volume among all trauma patients treated by an institution.

Objective  To test the hypothesis that outcomes of trauma care for geriatric patients are affected differently by the volume of geriatric cases and nongeriatric cases of an institution.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This retrospective cohort study using a statewide trauma registry was set in state-designated levels 1 and 2 trauma centers in Pennsylvania. It included 39 431 eligible geriatric trauma patients (aged >65 years) in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study.

Main Outcomes and Measures  In-hospital mortality, major complications, and mortality after major complications (failure to rescue).

Results  Between 2001 and 2010, 39 431 geriatric trauma patients and 105 046 nongeriatric patients were captured in a review of outcomes in 20 state-designated levels 1 and 2 trauma centers. Larger volumes of geriatric trauma patients were significantly associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and failure to rescue. In contrast, larger nongeriatric trauma volumes were significantly associated with higher odds of major complications in geriatric patients.

Conclusions and Relevance  Higher rates of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and failure to rescue were associated with lower volumes of geriatric trauma care and paradoxically with higher volumes of trauma care for younger patients. These findings offer the possibility that outcomes might be improved with differentiated pathways of care for geriatric trauma patients.

×