Colorectal Cancer Resections in the Aging US Population: A Trend Toward Decreasing Rates and Improved Outcomes | Colorectal Cancer | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
US Census Bureau.  Detailed tables, population 55 years and over by sex and age: 2011.http://www.census.gov/population/age/data/2011.html. Accessed March 24, 2013.
2.
Administration on Aging.  Aging Statistics: 2011.http://www.aoa.gov/aoaroot/aging_statistics/index.aspx. Accessed March 24, 2013.
3.
Hoobs  FBD, Bonnie  L.  65+ in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census; 1996.
4.
Yancik  R, Ries  LA.  Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world.  Semin Oncol. 2004;31(2):128-136.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Wo  JY, Hong  TS, Kachnic  LA.  Impact of age and comorbidities on the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.  Semin Radiat Oncol. 2012;22(4):311-320.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Loran  DB, Hyde  BR, Zwischenberger  JB.  Perioperative management of special populations: the geriatric patient.  Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(6):1259-1266, xi.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Turrentine  FE, Wang  H, Simpson  VB, Jones  RS.  Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients.  J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):865-877.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Agarwal  N, Leighton  L, Mandile  MA, Cayten  CG.  Outcomes of surgery for colorectal cancer in patients age 80 years and older.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85(9):1096-1101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Arnaud  JP, Schloegel  M, Ollier  JC, Adloff  M.  Colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(10):896-898.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Kang  CY, Halabi  WJ, Chaudhry  OO,  et al.  A nationwide analysis of laparoscopy in high-risk colorectal surgery patients.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):382-391.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Liu  LL, Leung  JM.  Predicting adverse postoperative outcomes in patients aged 80 years or older.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(4):405-412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Damhuis  RA, Wereldsma  JC, Wiggers  T.  The influence of age on resection rates and postoperative mortality in 6457 patients with colorectal cancer.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11(1):45-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Edna  TH, Bjerkeset  T.  Colorectal cancer in patients over 80 years of age.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45(24):2142-2145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Pedrazzani  C, Cerullo  G, De Marco  G,  et al.  Impact of age-related comorbidity on results of colorectal cancer surgery.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(45):5706-5711.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group.  Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review.  Lancet. 2000;356(9234):968-974.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
National Cancer Institute.  Colon and rectal cancer.http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/colon-and-rectal. Accessed March 24, 2013.
17.
Edwards  BK, Ward  E, Kohler  BA,  et al.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.  Cancer. 2010;116(3):544-573.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kang  CY, Halabi  WJ, Luo  R, Pigazzi  A, Nguyen  NT, Stamos  MJ.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends.  Arch Surg. 2012;147(8):724-731.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Huber  PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In:  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967:221-233.
20.
Holm  S.  Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.  Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65-70.Google Scholar
21.
Wright  SP.  Adjusted P-values for simultaneous inference.  Biometrics. 1992;48:1005-1013. doi:10.2307/2532694.Google ScholarCrossref
22.
van Walraven  C, Austin  PC, Jennings  A, Quan  H, Forster  AJ.  A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.  Med Care. 2009;47(6):626-633.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Zauber  AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar  I, Knudsen  AB, Wilschut  J, van Ballegooijen  M, Kuntz  KM.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.  Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659-669.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
American Cancer Society.  Cancer facts and figures: 2012.http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsfigures/cancerfactsfigures/cancer-facts-figures-2012. Accessed March 27, 2013.
25.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.  Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):129-131.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Medicare.gov.  The official U.S. government site for Medicare.http://www.medicare.gov/coverage/colorectal-cancer-screenings.html. Accessed March 27, 2013.
27.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.  Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627-637.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Hamel  MB, Henderson  WG, Khuri  SF, Daley  J.  Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(3):424-429.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Kunitake  H, Zingmond  DS, Ryoo  J, Ko  CY.  Caring for octogenarian and nonagenarian patients with colorectal cancer: what should our standards and expectations be?  Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(5):735-743.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Kiran  RP, Attaluri  V, Hammel  J, Church  J.  A novel nomogram accurately quantifies the risk of mortality in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery.  Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):905-908.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
SURGICAL CARE OF THE AGING POPULATION
June 2014

Colorectal Cancer Resections in the Aging US Population: A Trend Toward Decreasing Rates and Improved Outcomes

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):557-564. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4930
Abstract

Importance  The incidence of colorectal cancer in elderly patients is likely to increase, but there is a lack of large nationwide data regarding the mortality and morbidity of colorectal cancer resections in the aging population.

Objective  To examine the surgical trends and outcomes of colorectal cancer treatment in the elderly.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A review of operative outcomes for colorectal cancer in the United States was conducted in a Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2010. Patients were stratified within age groups of 45 to 64, 65 to 69, 70 to 74, 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 years and older. Postoperative complications and yearly trends were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression was used to compare in-hospital mortality and morbidity between individual groups of patients 65 years and older and those aged 45 to 64 years while controlling for sex, comorbidities, procedure type, diagnosis, and hospital status.

Main Outcomes and Measures  In-hospital mortality and morbidity.

Results  Among the estimated 1 043 108 patients with colorectal cancer sampled, 63.8% of the operations were performed on those 65 years and older and 22.6% on patients 80 years and older. Patients 80 years and older were 1.7 times more likely to undergo urgent admission than those younger than 65 years. Patients younger than 65 years accounted for 46.0% of the laparoscopies performed in the elective setting compared with 14.1% for patients 80 years and older. Mortality during the 10 years decreased by a mean of 6.6%, with the most considerable decrease observed in the population 85 years and older (9.1%). Patients 80 years and older had an associated $9492 higher hospital charge and an increased 2½-day length of stay vs patients younger than 65 years. Compared with patients aged 45 to 64 years, higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was observed in patients with advancing age: 65 to 69 years (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.18-1.49), 70 to 74 years (2.02; 1.82-2.24), 75 to 79 years (2.51; 2.28-2.76), 80 to 84 years (3.15; 2.86-3.46), and 85 years and older (4.72; 4.30-5.18) (P < .01). Compared with patients aged 45 to 64 years, higher risk-adjusted morbidity was noted in those with advancing age: 65 to 69 years (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.21-1.29), 70 to 74 years (1.40; 1.36-1.45), 75 to 79 years (1.54; 1.49-1.58), 80 to 84 years (1.68; 1.63-1.74), and 85 years and older (1.96; 1.89-2.03) (P < .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Most operations for colorectal cancer are performed on the aging population, with an overall decrease in the number of cases performed. Despite the overall improved mortality seen during the past 10 years, the risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity of the elderly continue to be substantially higher than that for the younger population.

×