Protocol-Driven Ventilator Management in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit Population | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Stauffer  JLOlson  DEPetty  TL Complications and consequences of endotracheal intubation and tracheotomy: a prospective study of 150 critically ill adult patients.  Am J Med. 1981;7065- 76Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Vassal  TAnh  NGDGabillet  JM  et al.  Prospective evaluation of self-extubations in a medical intensive care unit.  Intensive Care Med. 1993;19340- 342Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Kirton  OCDeHaven  CBHudson-Civetta  J  et al.  Re-engineering ventilatory support to decrease days and improve resource utilization.  Ann Surg. 1996;224396- 402discussion 402-404Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Kollef  MHHorst  HMPrang  LBrock  WA Reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation: three examples of change in the intensive care unit.  New Horiz. 1998;652- 60Google Scholar
5.
Brochard  LRauss  ABenito  S  et al.  Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150896- 903Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Faul  FErdfelder  E G Power: A Priori, Post-hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for MS-DOS [computer program].  Bonn, Germany Dept of Psychology, Bonn University1992;
7.
Riker  RRFraser  GLCox  PM Continous infusion of haloperidol controls agitation in critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 1994;22433- 440Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Shapiro  BAWarren  JEgol  AB  et al.  Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive care unit: an executive summary.  Crit Care Med. 1995;231596- 1600Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Devlin  JWHolbrook  AMFuller  HD The effect of ICU sedation guidelines and pharmacist interventions on clinical outcomes and drug cost.  Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31689- 695Google Scholar
10.
Esteban  AFrutos  FTobin  MJ  et al.  A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation.  N Engl J Med. 1995;332345- 350Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Ely  EWBaker  AMDunagan  DP  et al.  Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously.  N Engl J Med. 1996;3351864- 1869Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Ely  EWBennett  PABowton  DL  et al.  Large scale implemention of a respiratory therapist–driven protocol for ventilator weaning.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159439- 446Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Boulain  T Unplanned extubation in the adult intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;1571131- 1137Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Mort  TC Unplanned tracheal extubation outside the operating room: a quality improvement audit of hemodynamic and tracheal airway complications associated with emergency tracheal reintubation.  Anesth Analg. 1998;861171- 1176Google Scholar
Original Article
November 2002

Protocol-Driven Ventilator Management in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit Population

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.

Arch Surg. 2002;137(11):1223-1227. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1223
Abstract

Hypothesis  The use of weaning and sedation protocols affects the intensive care unit (ICU) course of a trauma population.

Design  Nonrandomized before-after trial.

Setting  A level I trauma center.

Patients  Three hundred twenty-eight consecutive trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation treated in the ICU between October 1, 1997, and November 1, 1999.

Intervention  Sedation and weaning protocols were used to treat patients receiving mechanical ventilation during the second year of this study.

Main Outcome Measures  Self-extubation rates, ventilator days, number of ICU days, and charges.

Results  There were 168 patients in the preprotocol group (year 1: October 1, 1997, to October 31, 1998) and 160 patients in the postprotocol group (year 2: November 1, 1998, to November 30, 1999). The groups were similar in age (P = .68), Injury Severity Score (P = .06), and Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .29). There were no differences in self-extubation rates (P = .57), ventilator days (P = .83), ventilator charges (P = .83), number of ICU days (P = .67), or ICU charges (P = .67) between the 2 groups. No statistical difference was identified in any of these categories when long-term ventilator patients (defined as ventilator length of stay ≥3 SDs above the mean) were excluded.

Conclusions  Use of weaning and sedation protocols did not affect the measured outcomes in this study. These findings may reflect difficulties inherent in the protocols or with their utilization. Further subgroup analysis focusing on ventilator-associated pneumonias and mortality may demonstrate benefits not identified herein.

×