Lung Cancer Resection at Hospitals With High vs Low Mortality Rates | Lung Cancer | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Finks  JF, Osborne  NH, Birkmeyer  JD.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.  N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128-2137.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Ghaferi  AA, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery.  Med Care. 2011;49(12):1076-1081.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Begg  CB, Cramer  LD, Hoskins  WJ, Brennan  MF.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.  JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747-1751.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Birkmeyer  JD, Finks  JF, O’Reilly  A,  et al; Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.  Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery.  N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434-1442.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Ghaferi  AA, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery.  N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1368-1375.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Williams  RT, Stewart  AK, Winchester  DP.  Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base.  Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):377-388, vii.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Winchester  DP, Stewart  AK, Bura  C, Jones  RS.  The National Cancer Data Base: a clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool.  J Surg Oncol. 2004;85(1):1-3.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Revels  SL, Wong  SL, Banerjee  M, Yin  H, Birkmeyer  JD.  Differences in perioperative care at low- and high-mortality hospitals with cancer surgery.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(7):2129-2135.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Wong  SL, Revels  SL, Yin  H,  et al.  Variation in hospital mortality rates with inpatient cancer surgery.  Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):632-636.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Staiger  DO, Dimick  JB, Baser  O, Fan  Z, Birkmeyer  JD.  Empirically derived composite measures of surgical performance.  Med Care. 2009;47(2):226-233.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Dimick  JB, Staiger  DO, Baser  O, Birkmeyer  JD.  Composite measures for predicting surgical mortality in the hospital.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):1189-1198.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Dimick  JB, Ghaferi  AA, Osborne  NH, Ko  CY, Hall  BL.  Reliability adjustment for reporting hospital outcomes with surgery.  Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):703-707.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Waljee  JF, Windisch  S, Finks  JF, Wong  SL, Birkmeyer  JD.  Classifying cause of death after cancer surgery.  Surg Innov. 2006;13(4):274-279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Elixhauser  A, Steiner  C, Harris  DR, Coffey  RM.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.  Med Care. 1998;36(1):8-27.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
LaPar  DJ, Bhamidipati  CM, Lau  CL, Jones  DR, Kozower  BD.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: establishing generalizability to national lung cancer resection outcomes.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(1):216-221.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Spolverato  G, Ejaz  A, Hyder  O, Kim  Y, Pawlik  TM.  Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery.  Br J Surg. 2014;101(7):836-846.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Gonzalez  AA, Dimick  JB, Birkmeyer  JD, Ghaferi  AA.  Understanding the volume-outcome effect in cardiovascular surgery: the role of failure to rescue.  JAMA Surg. 2014;149(2):119-123.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Ghaferi  AA, Osborne  NH, Birkmeyer  JD, Dimick  JB.  Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue from complications after pancreatectomy.  J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):325-330.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
November 2015

Lung Cancer Resection at Hospitals With High vs Low Mortality Rates

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 2Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health Care System, Hanover, New Hampshire
JAMA Surg. 2015;150(11):1034-1040. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2199
Abstract

Importance  Wide variations in mortality rates exist across hospitals following lung cancer resection; however, the factors underlying these differences remain unclear.

Objective  To evaluate perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent lung cancer resection at hospitals with very high and very low mortality rates (high-mortality hospitals [HMHs] and low-mortality hospitals [LMHs]) to better understand the factors related to differences in mortality rates after lung cancer resection.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this retrospective cohort study, 1279 hospitals that were accredited by the Commission on Cancer were ranked on a composite measure of risk-adjusted mortality following major cancer resections performed from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006. We collected data from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2007, on 645 lung resections in 18 LMHs and 25 HMHs. After adjusting for patient characteristics, we used hierarchical logistic regression to examine differences in the incidence of complications and “failure-to-rescue” rates (defined as death following a complication).

Main Outcomes and Measures  Rates of adherence to processes of care, incidence of complications, and failure to rescue following complications.

Results  Among 645 patients who received lung resections (441 in LMHs and 204 in HMHs), the overall unadjusted mortality rates were 1.6% (n = 7) vs 10.8% (n = 22; P < .001) for LMHs and HMHs, respectively. Following risk adjustment, the difference in mortality rates was attenuated (1.8% vs 8.1%; P < .001) but remained significant. Overall, complication rates were higher in HMHs (23.3% vs 15.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.79; 95% CI, 0.99-3.21), but this difference was not significant. The likelihood of any surgical (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26-2.00) or cardiopulmonary (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.70-2.16) complications was similar between LMHs and HMHs. However, failure-to-rescue rates were significantly higher in HMHs (25.9% vs 8.7%; aOR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.44-29.88).

Conclusions and Relevance  Failure-to-rescue rates are higher at HMHs, which may explain the large differences between hospitals in mortality rates following lung cancer resection. This finding emphasizes the need for better understanding of the factors related to complications and their subsequent management.

×