Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis | Emergency Medicine | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Wier  LM, Yu  H, Owens  PL, Washington  R.  Overview of Children in the Emergency Department, 2010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality; 2013.
2.
Barrett  ML, Hines  AL, Andrews  RM.  Trends in Rates of Perforated Appendix, 2001-2010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality; 2013.
3.
Varadhan  KK, Neal  KR, Lobo  DN.  Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.  BMJ. 2012;344:e2156.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Wilms  IM, de Hoog  DE, de Visser  DC, Janzing  HM.  Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD008359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Minneci  PC, Sulkowski  JP, Nacion  KM,  et al.  Feasibility of a nonoperative management strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.  J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219(2):272-279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Armstrong  J, Merritt  N, Jones  S, Scott  L, Bütter  A.  Non-operative management of early, acute appendicitis in children: is it safe and effective?  J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(5):782-785.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Kocataş  A, Gönenç  M, Bozkurt  MA, Karabulut  M, Gemici  E, Alış  H.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(3):200-204.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Tiwari  MM, Reynoso  JF, Tsang  AW, Oleynikov  D.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.  Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):927-932.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Malagon  AM, Arteaga-Gonzalez  I, Rodriguez-Ballester  L.  Outcomes after laparoscopic treatment of complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective, comparative trial.  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(6):721-725.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Ikeda  H, Ishimaru  Y, Takayasu  H, Okamura  K, Kisaki  Y, Fujino  J.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.  J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(11):1680-1685.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Cash  CL, Frazee  RC, Abernathy  SW,  et al.  A prospective treatment protocol for outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.  J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):101-105.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Emil  S, Laberge  J-M, Mikhail  P,  et al.  Appendicitis in children: a ten-year update of therapeutic recommendations.  J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(2):236-242.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Coran  AG, Adzick  NS, Krummel  TM, Laberge  J-M, Shamberger  RC, Caldamone  AA, eds.  Pediatric Surgery.7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012.
14.
Zwintscher  NP, Johnson  EK, Martin  MJ, Newton  CR.  Laparoscopy utilization and outcomes for appendicitis in small children.  J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(9):1941-1945.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lee  SL, Yaghoubian  A, Kaji  A.  Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status.  Arch Surg. 2011;146(10):1118-1121.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Esposito  C, Borzi  P, Valla  JS,  et al.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.  World J Surg. 2007;31(4):750-755.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Rice-Townsend  S, Hall  M, Barnes  JN, Baxter  JK, Rangel  SJ.  Hospital readmission after management of appendicitis at freestanding children’s hospitals: contemporary trends and financial implications.  J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(6):1170-1176.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Di Saverio  S, Sibilio  A, Giorgini  E,  et al.  The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis.  Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):109-117.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Eriksson  S, Granström  L.  Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis.  Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):166-169.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Hansson  J, Körner  U, Khorram-Manesh  A, Solberg  A, Lundholm  K.  Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients.  Br J Surg. 2009;96(5):473-481.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Hansson  J, Körner  U, Ludwigs  K, Johnsson  E, Jönsson  C, Lundholm  K.  Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.  World J Surg. 2012;36(9):2028-2036.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Styrud  J, Eriksson  S, Nilsson  I,  et al.  Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.  World J Surg. 2006;30(6):1033-1037.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Vons  C, Barry  C, Maitre  S,  et al.  Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2011;377(9777):1573-1579.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Svensson  JF, Patkova  B, Almström  M,  et al.  Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial.  Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):67-71.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Minneci  PC, Deans  KJ.  Is an RCT the best way to investigate the effectiveness of nonoperative management of pediatric appendicitis? [published online October 31, 2015].  Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001275.Google Scholar
26.
Barkun  JS, Aronson  JK, Feldman  LS,  et al; Balliol Collaboration.  Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.  Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1089-1096.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Ergina  PL, Cook  JA, Blazeby  JM,  et al; Balliol Collaboration.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.  Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1097-1104.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Corrigan  PW, Salzer  MS.  The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity.  Eval Program Plann. 2003;26(2):109-121.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Patsopoulos  NA.  A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials.  Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(2):217-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Preference Collaborative Review Group.  Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis.  BMJ. 2008;337:a1864.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Brewin  CR, Bradley  C.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.  BMJ. 1989;299(6694):313-315.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Britton  A, McKee  M, Black  N, McPherson  K, Sanderson  C, Bain  C.  Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.  Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(13):i-iv, 1-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Shindoh  J, Niwa  H, Kawai  K,  et al.  Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):309-314.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Harris  PA, Taylor  R, Thielke  R, Payne  J, Gonzalez  N, Conde  JG.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.  J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Chan  KS, Mangione-Smith  R, Burwinkle  TM, Rosen  M, Varni  JW.  The PedsQL: reliability and validity of the short-form generic core scales and Asthma Module.  Med Care. 2005;43(3):256-265.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Varni  JW, Seid  M, Kurtin  PS.  PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.  Med Care. 2001;39(8):800-812.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Varni  JW, Seid  M, Rode  CA.  The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory.  Med Care. 1999;37(2):126-139.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Varni  JW, Burwinkle  TM, Seid  M, Skarr  D.  The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity.  Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(6):329-341.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Varni  JW, Limbers  CA.  The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales Young Adult Version: feasibility, reliability and validity in a university student population.  J Health Psychol. 2009;14(4):611-622.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Varni  JW, Seid  M, Knight  TS, Uzark  K, Szer  IS.  The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision-making.  J Behav Med. 2002;25(2):175-193.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Varni  JW, Burwinkle  TM, Dickinson  P,  et al.  Evaluation of the built environment at a children’s convalescent hospital: development of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory parent and staff satisfaction measures for pediatric health care facilities.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004;25(1):10-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Boskin  MJ, Dulberger  ER, Gordon  RJ, Griliches  Z, Jorgenson  DW.  Consumer prices, the Consumer Price Index, and the cost of living.  J Econ Perspect. 1998;12(1):3-26. doi:10.1257/jep.12.1.3.Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Bryan  MF, Cecchetti  SG.  The Consumer Price Index as a Measure of Inflation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1993.
44.
Newcombe  RG.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.  Stat Med. 1998;17(8):857-872.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Agresti  A, Coull  BA.  Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions.  Am Stat. 1998;52(2):119-126. doi:10.2307/2685469.Google Scholar
46.
Fitzmaurice  GJ, McWilliams  B, Hurreiz  H, Epanomeritakis  E.  Antibiotics versus appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis: a review of the current evidence.  Can J Surg. 2011;54(5):307-314.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Mason  RJ, Moazzez  A, Sohn  H, Katkhouda  N.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated (no abscess or phlegmon) appendicitis.  Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(2):74-84.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Liu  C, Robin  AL, Brenner  S, Eastman  J.  Social acceptability of methylphenidate and behavior modification for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.  Pediatrics. 1991;88(3):560-565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
49.
Davis  CC, Claudius  M, Palinkas  LA, Wong  JB, Leslie  LK.  Putting families in the center: family perspectives on decision making and ADHD and implications for ADHD care.  J Atten Disord. 2012;16(8):675-684.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Bussing  R, Gary  FA, Mills  TL, Garvan  CW.  Parental explanatory models of ADHD: gender and cultural variations.  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38(10):563-575.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Coyne  I, Gallagher  P.  Participation in communication and decision-making: children and young people’s experiences in a hospital setting.  J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(15-16):2334-2343.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Lewis  CC, Pantell  RH, Sharp  L.  Increasing patient knowledge, satisfaction, and involvement: randomized trial of a communication intervention.  Pediatrics. 1991;88(2):351-358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
53.
Lipstein  EA, Brinkman  WB, Britto  MT.  What is known about parents’ treatment decisions? a narrative review of pediatric decision making.  Med Decis Making. 2012;32(2):246-258.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Pennarola  BW, Rodday  AM, Mayer  DK,  et al; HSCT-CHESS Study.  Factors associated with parental activation in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant.  Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(2):194-214.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Post  DM, Cegala  DJ, Miser  WF.  The other half of the whole: teaching patients to communicate with physicians.  Fam Med. 2002;34(5):344-352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
56.
Kwan  BM, Dimidjian  S, Rizvi  SL.  Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression.  Behav Res Ther. 2010;48(8):799-804.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Brinkman  WB, Epstein  JN.  Treatment planning for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: treatment utilization and family preferences.  Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:45-56.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
58.
Salem  L, Anaya  DA, Flum  DR.  Temporal changes in the management of diverticulitis.  J Surg Res. 2005;124(2):318-323.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
59.
Chapman  J, Davies  M, Wolff  B,  et al.  Complicated diverticulitis: is it time to rethink the rules?  Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):576-581.PubMedGoogle Scholar
60.
McCafferty  MH, Roth  L, Jorden  J.  Current management of diverticulitis.  Am Surg. 2008;74(11):1041-1049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
61.
Rypens  F, Dubois  J, Garel  L.  The place of interventional radiology in Crohn disease in children.  Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37(11):1093-1095.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
62.
Krivak  TC, Cooksey  C, Propst  AM.  Tubo-ovarian abscess: diagnosis, medical and surgical management.  Compr Ther. 2004;30(2):93-100.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
May 2016

Effectiveness of Patient Choice in Nonoperative vs Surgical Management of Pediatric Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
  • 2Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(5):408-415. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4534
Abstract

Importance  Current evidence suggests that nonoperative management of uncomplicated appendicitis is safe, but overall effectiveness is determined by combining medical outcomes with the patient’s and family’s perspective, goals, and expectations.

Objective  To determine the effectiveness of patient choice in nonoperative vs surgical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Prospective patient choice cohort study in patients aged 7 to 17 years with acute uncomplicated appendicitis presenting at a single pediatric tertiary acute care hospital from October 1, 2012, through March 6, 2013. Participating patients and families gave informed consent and chose between nonoperative management and urgent appendectomy.

Interventions  Urgent appendectomy or nonoperative management entailing at least 24 hours of inpatient observation while receiving intravenous antibiotics and, on demonstrating improvement of symptoms, completion of 10 days of treatment with oral antibiotics.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the 1-year success rate of nonoperative management. Successful nonoperative management was defined as not undergoing an appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of the rates of complicated appendicitis, disability days, and health care costs between nonoperative management and surgery.

Results  A total of 102 patients were enrolled; 65 patients/families chose appendectomy (median age, 12 years; interquartile range [IQR], 9-13 years; 45 male [69.2%]) and 37 patients/families chose nonoperative management (median age, 11 years; IQR, 10-14 years; 24 male [64.9%]). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The success rate of nonoperative management was 89.2% (95% CI, 74.6%-97.0%) at 30 days (33 of 37 children) and 75.7% (95% CI, 58.9%-88.2%) at 1 year (28 of 37 children). The incidence of complicated appendicitis was 2.7% in the nonoperative group (1 of 37 children) and 12.3% in the surgery group (8 of 65 children) (P = .15). After 1 year, children managed nonoperatively compared with the surgery group had fewer disability days (median [IQR], 8 [5-18] vs 21 [15-25] days, respectively; P < .001) and lower appendicitis-related health care costs (median [IQR], $4219 [$2514-$7795] vs $5029 [$4596-$5482], respectively; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  When chosen by the family, nonoperative management is an effective treatment strategy for children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, incurring less morbidity and lower costs than surgery.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01718275

×