Surgeons’ Disclosures of Clinical Adverse Events | Health Care Safety | JAMA Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better healthcare—2010 update. Published April 2010. Accessed February 28, 2016.
Conway  J, Federico  F, Stewart  K, Campbell  MJ. Respectful Management of Serious Clinical Adverse Events. 2nd ed. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2011. Accessed February 28, 2016.
Boothman  RC, Blackwell  AC, Campbell  DA  Jr, Commiskey  E, Anderson  S.  A better approach to medical malpractice claims? the University of Michigan experience.  J Health Life Sci Law. 2009;2(2):125-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kachalia  A, Kaufman  SR, Boothman  R,  et al.  Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program.  Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):213-221.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Iezzoni  LI, Rao  SR, DesRoches  CM, Vogeli  C, Campbell  EG.  Survey shows that at least some physicians are not always open or honest with patients.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(2):383-391.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Iedema  R, Allen  S, Britton  K,  et al.  Patients’ and family members’ views on how clinicians enact and how they should enact incident disclosure: the “100 patient stories” qualitative study.  BMJ. 2011;343:d4423.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gallagher  TH, Studdert  D, Levinson  W.  Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients.  N Engl J Med. 2007;356(26):2713-2719.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gallagher  TH, Garbutt  JM, Waterman  AD,  et al.  Choosing your words carefully: how physicians would disclose harmful medical errors to patients.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1585-1593.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Waterman  AD, Garbutt  J, Hazel  E,  et al.  The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33(8):467-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gallagher  TH, Waterman  AD, Ebers  AG, Fraser  VJ, Levinson  W.  Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors.  JAMA. 2003;289(8):1001-1007.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Department of Veterans Affairs.  Disclosure of Adverse Events to Patients: Veterans Health Administration, Handbook 1004.08. Washington, DC: Dept of Veterans Affairs; 2012.
S2400, 187th Leg, An Act Improving the Quality of Health Care and Reducing Costs through Increased Transparency, Efficiency and Innovation (MA 2012).
Delbanco  T, Bell  SK.  Guilty, afraid, and alone—struggling with medical error.  N Engl J Med. 2007;357(17):1682-1683.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors.  When Things Go Wrong: Responding to Adverse Events: A Consensus Statement of the Harvard Hospitals. Boston: Massachusetts Coalition for the Prevention of Medical Errors; 2006.
Mazor  KM, Reed  GW, Yood  RA, Fischer  MA, Baril  J, Gurwitz  JH.  Disclosure of medical errors: what factors influence how patients respond?  J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(7):704-710.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Scott  SD, Hirschinger  LE, Cox  KR, McCoig  M, Brandt  J, Hall  LW.  The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events.  Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):325-330.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Shanafelt  TD, Balch  CM, Bechamps  G,  et al.  Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons.  Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995-1000.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Vincent  C.  Understanding and responding to adverse events.  N Engl J Med. 2003;348(11):1051-1056.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Balch  CM, Freischlag  JA, Shanafelt  TD.  Stress and burnout among surgeons: understanding and managing the syndrome and avoiding the adverse consequences.  Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):371-376.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hu  Y-Y, Fix  ML, Hevelone  ND,  et al.  Physicians’ needs in coping with emotional stressors: the case for peer support.  Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):212-217.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Stiegler  MP.  A piece of my mind: what I learned about adverse events from Captain Sully: it’s not what you think.  JAMA. 2015;313(4):361-362.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Veterans' Benefits Part IV–General Administrative Provisions, Chapter 57—Records and Investigations, Subchapter I—Records, 38 USC § 5705 Confidentiality of medical quality-assurance records (2010).
Kaldjian  LC, Jones  EW, Wu  BJ, Forman-Hoffman  VL, Levi  BH, Rosenthal  GE.  Disclosing medical errors to patients: attitudes and practices of physicians and trainees.  J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(7):988-996.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Elwy  AR, Mueller  NM, Eisen  SV, Gallagher  TH, Rosen  AK, Bokhour  BG. Communicating adverse patient events in surgery: the CAPES study. Paper presented at: Communication, Medicine and Ethics international research conference; June 28, 2010; Boston, MA.
Benjamini  Y, Hochberg  Y.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.  J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289-300.Google Scholar
Glickman  ME, Rao  SR, Schultz  MR.  False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(8):850-857.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lazare  A.  Apology in medical practice: an emerging clinical skill.  JAMA. 2006;296(11):1401-1404.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Espin  S, Levinson  W, Regehr  G, Baker  GR, Lingard  L.  Error or “act of God”? a study of patients’ and operating room team members’ perceptions of error definition, reporting, and disclosure.  Surgery. 2006;139(1):6-14.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Duclos  CW, Eichler  M, Taylor  L,  et al.  Patient perspectives of patient-provider communication after adverse events.  Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(6):479-486.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dunn  EJ, McKinney  KM, Martin  ME.  Empathic disclosure of adverse events to patients.  Fed Pract. 2014;31(5):18-21.Google Scholar
Shapiro  J, Whittemore  A, Tsen  LC.  Instituting a culture of professionalism: the establishment of a center for professionalism and peer support.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(4):168-177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Petrides  KV, McManus  IC.  Mapping medical careers: questionnaire assessment of career preferences in medical school applicants and final-year students.  BMC Med Educ. 2004;4:18.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bell  SK, Smulowitz  PB, Woodward  AC,  et al.  Disclosure, apology, and offer programs: stakeholders’ views of barriers to and strategies for broad implementation.  Milbank Q. 2012;90(4):682-705.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mello  MM, Boothman  RC, McDonald  T,  et al.  Communication-and-resolution programs: the challenges and lessons learned from six early adopters.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(1):20-29.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
November 2016

Surgeons’ Disclosures of Clinical Adverse Events

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts
  • 5Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park
  • 7Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • 8Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, Washington
  • 9Department of Surgery, University of Washington Healthcare System, Seattle
  • 10Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven
  • 11Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 12Department of Bioethics, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle
  • 13Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1015-1021. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1787
Key Points

Question  How are surgeons disclosing adverse events to patients, and what is the effect of such disclosure on surgeons’ well-being?

Findings  In this observational study of surgeons at Veterans Affairs facilities who completed 62 web-based surveys about their experiences disclosing adverse events to patients, those who were less likely to follow nationally recommended elements of disclosure were more likely to report being negatively affected by the adverse event.

Meaning  Open disclosure programs are being implemented nationwide, but without training on disclosing adverse events using specific communication elements, surgeons may experience negative effects when disclosing such information.


Importance  Surgeons are frequently faced with clinical adverse events owing to the nature of their specialty, yet not all surgeons disclose these events to patients. To sustain open disclosure programs, it is essential to understand how surgeons are disclosing adverse events, factors that are associated with reporting such events, and the effect of disclosure on surgeons.

Objective  To quantitatively assess surgeons’ reports of disclosure of adverse events and aspects of their experiences with the disclosure process.

Design, Setting, and Participants  An observational study was conducted from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, involving a 21-item baseline questionnaire administered to 67 of 75 surgeons (89%) representing 12 specialties at 3 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Sixty-two surveys of their communication about adverse events and experiences with disclosing such events were completed by 35 of these 67 surgeons (52%). Data were analyzed using mixed linear random-effects and logistic regression models.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Self-reports of disclosure assessed by 8 items from guidelines and pilot research, surgeons’ perceptions of the adverse event, reported personal effects from disclosure, and baseline attitudes toward disclosure.

Results  Most of the surgeons completing the web-based surveys (41 responses from men and 21 responses from women) used 5 of the 8 recommended disclosure items: explained why the event happened (55 of 60 surveys [92%]), expressed regret for what happened (52 of 60 [87%]), expressed concern for the patient’s welfare (57 of 60 [95%]), disclosed the adverse event within 24 hours (58 of 60 [97%]), and discussed steps taken to treat any subsequent problems (59 of 60 [98%]). Fewer surgeons apologized to patients (33 of 60 [55%]), discussed whether the event was preventable (33 of 60 [55%]), or how recurrences could be prevented (19 of 59 [32%]). Surgeons who were less likely to have discussed prevention (33 of 60 [55%]), those who stated the event was very or extremely serious (40 of 61 surveys [66%]), or reported very or somewhat difficult experiences discussing the event (16 of 61 [26%]) were more likely to have been negatively affected by the event. Surgeons with more negative attitudes about disclosure at baseline reported more anxiety about patients’ surgical outcomes or events following disclosure (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.06).

Conclusions and Relevance  Surgeons who reported they were less likely to discuss preventability of the adverse event, or who reported difficult communication experiences, were more negatively affected by disclosure than others. Quality improvement efforts focused on recognizing the association between disclosure and surgeons’ well-being may help sustain open disclosure policies.