Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers have played a major role in graduate medical education since the 1940s.1 Currently, the VA health system operates 168 medical centers across the United States and supports the clinical training of more than 41 200 medical residents annually.2 Teaching hospitals within the VA provide subspecialty medical and surgical care and perform the majority of complex and high-risk surgical procedures.3
The diversity of pathologic conditions requiring a plastic surgery skill set are prominent within the VA population: cancer reconstruction, hand surgery, facial fractures, and burn care.4,5 Educational opportunities are ample. Plastic surgery residents in university-based training programs typically rotate at the VA hospital for several months each year. This study examines the relationship between the plastic surgery service and resident education within the VA hospitals.
All cases performed by the Division of Plastic Surgery at a single VA (R. L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana) from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2016, were reviewed. Cases performed in both the main operating room and the minor procedure room (starting April 1, 2013) were included.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs were reviewed for all current plastic surgery residents at Indiana University School of Medicine. Surgeries performed at the VA hospital were identified and compared with case minimums required for successful completion of a plastic surgery residency. Integrated- and independent-track residents were evaluated separately. Procedures were classified as either reconstructive or aesthetic and then subdivided by body region: head and neck, breast, trunk, hand, lower extremity, and integument. This study received exempt status by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board.
A total of 5358 operative procedures were performed during the 7-year study period. A mean of 472 procedures were performed per year before 2013 compared with 1016 procedures per year after 2013. This change in operative volume directly correlates to the opening of a minor procedure room. Overall, the number of cases performed per year has steadily increased from 2012 to 2016: 450, 891, 949, 1036 and 1064, respectively.
Case logs for 16 current residents (10 integrated, 6 independent) were reviewed. A total of 7 residents (3 integrated, 4 independent) had completed all rotations at the VA hospital at the time of this study. Integrated residents spent a mean of 12.4 months rotating on the VA Plastic Surgery service during their 6-year residency, compared with 4.5 months in the 3-year independent program track. Overall, integrated residents completed a mean of 525 of 1000 required reconstructive cases and 10 of 150 required aesthetic cases while rotating at the VA hospital. Independent residents fulfilled 295 of 1000 reconstructive cases and 5 of 150 aesthetic cases. Both integrated and independent residents met 100% of case requirements in the subcategories of head/neck neoplasms, benign skin lesions, disease processes of the trunk, treatment of Dupuytren contractures, and nerve decompressions. Residents met at least 50% of the required case minimums in treatment of pressure ulcers, hand and upper extremity reconstruction by primary closure or skin graft, tendon transfers, and arthroplasty/arthrodesis (Table).
The unique partnership between the VA health system and US residency training programs is beneficial to both patients and trainees. There is increasing demand for plastic surgery procedures within the VA health system5 and residents serve as a major part of the work force.1,2 Trainees benefit from the diversity and complexity of pathologic conditions encountered in the veteran population; a disproportionately high number of minimum case requirements are satisfied during rotation at the VA hospital. This study is limited by the fact that it is a single study review and only includes current plastic surgery residents; ACGME case logs are unavailable after a resident graduates. However, the findings have shown that the VA health system is a valuable resource in the education of plastic surgeons.
Corresponding Author: Sunil S. Tholpady, MD, PhD, R. L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center Indianapolis, 705 Riley Hospital Dr, RI 2514, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (stholpad@iupui.edu).
Accepted for Publication: July 16, 2017.
Published Online: December 13, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4433
Author Contributions: Drs Sasor and Tholpady had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Sasor, Chu, Evans, Wooden, Cohen, Tholpady.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Sasor, Chu, Evans, Cook, Wooden, Tholpady.
Drafting of the manuscript: Sasor, Wooden, Tholpady.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Sasor, Chu, Evans, Cook, Cohen, Tholpady.
Statistical analysis: Sasor, Cook, Tholpady.
Obtained funding: Tholpady.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Chu, Wooden.
Study supervision: Chu, Wooden, Cohen.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Meeting Presentation: Presented at the 2017 Association of Veterans Affairs Surgeons Annual Meeting; May 9, 2017; Houston, Texas.
1.Longo
WE, Cheadle
W, Fink
A,
et al. The role of the Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in patient care, surgical education, research and faculty development.
Am J Surg. 2005;190(5):662-675.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Ravin
AG, Gottlieb
NB, Wang
HT,
et al. Effect of the Veterans Affairs Medical System on plastic surgery residency training.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(2):656-660.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Erdmann
D, Pradka
SP, Similie
E,
et al. Plastic surgery within the Veterans Affairs Medical System: proposed modified indications for operative procedures.
Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(1):105-110.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Patel
A, Shah
A, Acosta
JC, Clune
JE. Fighting to reconstruct plastic surgery for veterans.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5):720e-721e.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref